A Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches in Detecting Cognitive Impairment Using MRI Scans

Wei Liu, Jiarui Zhang, Yijun Zhao
{"title":"A Comparison of Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning Approaches in Detecting Cognitive Impairment Using MRI Scans","authors":"Wei Liu, Jiarui Zhang, Yijun Zhao","doi":"10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep learning has attracted a great amount of interest in recent years and has become a rapidly emerging field in artificial intelligence. In medical image analysis, deep learning methods have produced promising results comparable to and, in some cases, superior to human experts. Nevertheless, researchers have also noted the limitations and challenges of the deep learning approaches, especially in model selection and interpretability. This paper compares the efficacy of deep learning and traditional machine learning techniques in detecting cognitive impairment (CI) associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) using brain MRI scans. We base our study on 894 brain MRI scans provided by the open access OASIS platform. In particular, we explore two deep learning approaches: 1) a 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) and 2) a hybrid model with a CNN plus LSTM (CNN-LSTM) architecture. We further examine the performance of five traditional machine learning algorithms based on features extracted from the MRI images using the FreeSurfer software. Our experimental results demonstrate that the deep learning models achieve higher Precision and Recall, while the traditional machine learning methods deliver more stability and better performance in Specificity and overall accuracy. Our findings could serve as a case study to highlight the challenges in adopting deep learning-based approaches.","PeriodicalId":330838,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 46th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC54236.2022.00154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Deep learning has attracted a great amount of interest in recent years and has become a rapidly emerging field in artificial intelligence. In medical image analysis, deep learning methods have produced promising results comparable to and, in some cases, superior to human experts. Nevertheless, researchers have also noted the limitations and challenges of the deep learning approaches, especially in model selection and interpretability. This paper compares the efficacy of deep learning and traditional machine learning techniques in detecting cognitive impairment (CI) associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) using brain MRI scans. We base our study on 894 brain MRI scans provided by the open access OASIS platform. In particular, we explore two deep learning approaches: 1) a 3D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) and 2) a hybrid model with a CNN plus LSTM (CNN-LSTM) architecture. We further examine the performance of five traditional machine learning algorithms based on features extracted from the MRI images using the FreeSurfer software. Our experimental results demonstrate that the deep learning models achieve higher Precision and Recall, while the traditional machine learning methods deliver more stability and better performance in Specificity and overall accuracy. Our findings could serve as a case study to highlight the challenges in adopting deep learning-based approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深度学习和传统机器学习方法在MRI扫描中检测认知障碍的比较
近年来,深度学习引起了人们的极大兴趣,并已成为人工智能中一个迅速兴起的领域。在医学图像分析中,深度学习方法已经产生了与人类专家相当,甚至在某些情况下优于人类专家的有希望的结果。然而,研究人员也注意到深度学习方法的局限性和挑战,特别是在模型选择和可解释性方面。本文比较了深度学习和传统机器学习技术在使用脑MRI扫描检测与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的认知障碍(CI)方面的功效。我们的研究基于开放存取OASIS平台提供的894张脑MRI扫描。特别是,我们探索了两种深度学习方法:1)3D卷积神经网络(3D-CNN)和2)CNN + LSTM (CNN-LSTM)架构的混合模型。我们使用FreeSurfer软件进一步检查了基于从MRI图像中提取的特征的五种传统机器学习算法的性能。我们的实验结果表明,深度学习模型具有更高的Precision和Recall,而传统的机器学习方法在特异性和整体准确性方面具有更高的稳定性和更好的性能。我们的研究结果可以作为一个案例研究,以突出采用基于深度学习的方法所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Category-Aware App Permission Recommendation based on Sparse Linear Model Early Detection of At-Risk Students in a Calculus Course Apple-YOLO: A Novel Mobile Terminal Detector Based on YOLOv5 for Early Apple Leaf Diseases A Safe Route Recommendation Method Based on Driver Characteristics from Telematics Data GSDNet: An Anti-interference Cochlea Segmentation Model Based on GAN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1