Factors predicting quality of life in stroke patients: A cross-sectional study

M. Dianati, Zahra Sirousinejad, Z. Sooki
{"title":"Factors predicting quality of life in stroke patients: A cross-sectional study","authors":"M. Dianati, Zahra Sirousinejad, Z. Sooki","doi":"10.4103/iahs.iahs_189_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Stroke affects the quality of life by affecting daily activities. This study aimed at determining the factors predicting quality of life in patients with stroke referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, sampling was done by census method during 2019 and in the first 6 months of 2020, and 188 patients with stroke referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan who had at least 2 months after stroke were evaluated. Data collection tools were questionnaire of Stroke Impact Scale-16 and possible factors associated with stroke. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 using the tests of Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (Spearman), and multivariate linear regression analysis. Findings: The mean quality of life was 50.92 ± 24.97. In univariate analysis, the quality of life was significantly associated with gender, marital status, education level, type of stroke, use of rehabilitation services, spouse's education level, occupation, number of children, regular exercise, history of hypertension, and previous history of stroke. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, 62.4% of variance was explained by four factors of the required number of rehabilitation sessions, history of previous stroke, level of education, and severity of stroke (F = 11.597, R2 = 0.624, and P < 0.001). The most important factor was the number of rehabilitation sessions required. Conclusion: To improve the stroke patients' quality of life, healthcare professionals should pay attention to the predictive role of low education level, more need for rehabilitation, severity, and history of stroke in their programs and procedures.","PeriodicalId":160562,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Health Sciences","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/iahs.iahs_189_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aims: Stroke affects the quality of life by affecting daily activities. This study aimed at determining the factors predicting quality of life in patients with stroke referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, sampling was done by census method during 2019 and in the first 6 months of 2020, and 188 patients with stroke referring to Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan who had at least 2 months after stroke were evaluated. Data collection tools were questionnaire of Stroke Impact Scale-16 and possible factors associated with stroke. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 16 using the tests of Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, independent t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient (Spearman), and multivariate linear regression analysis. Findings: The mean quality of life was 50.92 ± 24.97. In univariate analysis, the quality of life was significantly associated with gender, marital status, education level, type of stroke, use of rehabilitation services, spouse's education level, occupation, number of children, regular exercise, history of hypertension, and previous history of stroke. Based on the results of multivariate analysis, 62.4% of variance was explained by four factors of the required number of rehabilitation sessions, history of previous stroke, level of education, and severity of stroke (F = 11.597, R2 = 0.624, and P < 0.001). The most important factor was the number of rehabilitation sessions required. Conclusion: To improve the stroke patients' quality of life, healthcare professionals should pay attention to the predictive role of low education level, more need for rehabilitation, severity, and history of stroke in their programs and procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测中风患者生活质量的因素:一项横断面研究
目的:中风通过影响日常活动来影响生活质量。本研究旨在确定在卡尚市Shahid Beheshti医院就诊的中风患者生活质量的预测因素。材料与方法:采用横断面研究方法,于2019年和2020年前6个月采用人口普查方法抽样,对188例卒中后至少2个月就诊于卡尚市Shahid Beheshti医院的卒中患者进行评估。数据收集工具为卒中影响量表-16问卷及与卒中相关的可能因素。采用SPSS软件16版对数据进行分析,采用Mann-Whitney检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、独立t检验、Pearson相关系数(Spearman)检验和多元线性回归分析。结果:患者平均生活质量为50.92±24.97。在单变量分析中,生活质量与性别、婚姻状况、受教育程度、卒中类型、康复服务使用情况、配偶受教育程度、职业、子女数量、定期运动、高血压史和既往卒中史显著相关。多因素分析结果显示,62.4%的方差可由康复次数、既往卒中史、文化程度、卒中严重程度4个因素解释(F = 11.597, R2 = 0.624, P < 0.001)。最重要的因素是所需的康复疗程的数量。结论:为了提高脑卒中患者的生活质量,医护人员在制定方案和程序时应注意低文化程度、更需要康复、严重程度和脑卒中史等因素的预测作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of E-Learning on appropriate antibiotic prescribing by medical students: A quasi-experimental study during COVID-19 pandemic The effect of swedish massage combined with exercise therapy on nonspecific low back pain in the elderly: A randomized controlled clinical trial Clinician satisfaction and experience using teleconsultation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Pakistan: A cross-sectional study Treatment outcomes of acceptance and commitment therapy on severity of internet gaming disorder comorbid with ADHD in adolescents Bioecology of sandflies (Diptera: Psychodidae: Phlebotominae) in Khorramshahr County, the endemic focus of zoonotic cutaneous leishmaniasis in Khuzestan Province, Iran (2017–2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1