{"title":"Urdu as Persian","authors":"A. Dudney","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199478866.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on the writings of Siraj al-Din ʿAli Khan ‘Arzu’ (d. 1756), a critic of Persian literature and early theorist of what would come to be known as Urdu, Arthur Dudney shows how the sociolinguistic concept of ‘language planning’ can be used to understand the historical process through which a literary language is delineated and defined as such. Defining a new literary idiom involves identifying what that idiom is but also specifying what it is not. In the writings of Arzu and others, Dudney finds that the concept of rozmarrah (colloquial or ‘everyday’ language) was essential to defining what Urdu was, just as the exclusion of lexical items and forms of speech from Persian and Brajbhasha established what Urdu was not.","PeriodicalId":417009,"journal":{"name":"Text and Tradition in Early Modern North India","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Text and Tradition in Early Modern North India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199478866.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Focusing on the writings of Siraj al-Din ʿAli Khan ‘Arzu’ (d. 1756), a critic of Persian literature and early theorist of what would come to be known as Urdu, Arthur Dudney shows how the sociolinguistic concept of ‘language planning’ can be used to understand the historical process through which a literary language is delineated and defined as such. Defining a new literary idiom involves identifying what that idiom is but also specifying what it is not. In the writings of Arzu and others, Dudney finds that the concept of rozmarrah (colloquial or ‘everyday’ language) was essential to defining what Urdu was, just as the exclusion of lexical items and forms of speech from Persian and Brajbhasha established what Urdu was not.
Arthur Dudney专注于Siraj al-Din al- Ali Khan ' Arzu '(1756年)的作品,他是波斯文学批评家和乌尔都语的早期理论家,他展示了如何使用“语言规划”的社会语言学概念来理解文学语言被描绘和定义的历史过程。定义一个新的文学习语包括确定这个习语是什么,但也要说明它不是什么。在Arzu和其他人的著作中,Dudney发现rozmarrah(口语化或“日常”语言)的概念对于定义乌尔都语是至关重要的,就像波斯语和布拉杰巴沙语中词汇项目和语言形式的排除确定了乌尔都语不是什么一样。