Development of a rapid diagnostic test for the detection of antibodies or antigens to Coronavirus (COVID-19)

James Elliff
{"title":"Development of a rapid diagnostic test for the detection of antibodies or antigens to Coronavirus (COVID-19)","authors":"James Elliff","doi":"10.5920/fields.978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Theglobal health crisis caused by COVID-19 has overwhelmed both healthcaresettings and economies globally. Whilst mass population testing has improveddrastically, recent reviews of existing methods have highlighted variousshortcomings with these methods. Theaim of this project was to investigate whether the LAA could be modified andutilised as rapid detection test which either matched or exceeded the existingsensitivity and specificity values.   TheLAA investigated whether the COVID-19 spike protein could be detected insamples. COVID-19 specific IgM and IgG were used in conjunction with a seriesof non-specific antigens. Control or AG containing samples weremixed with AB-microsphere complexes on glass microscope slides. Manualvisualisation identified various levels of agglutination. Light microscopy andspectrophotometry at 405nm determined that the LAA could detect at least 2.3ngof spike protein.  Theparticle counting tool of ImageJ was utilised to obtain a dataset which wassubjected to statistical analysis which indicated that there was a significantdifference between control samples and live tests, P = 0.000102 for the spikeprotein assay and P = 0.254 for the non-specific assay respectively. Theresults obtained fell in line with a similar study conducted by Buffin et al in2018. Theanalytical methods used in this project twinned with data obtained in previousstudies supports the significant difference between control values and livetest values. The LAA is easier, quicker to use (results in ≤ 30 minutes) andcheaper, with potentially better sensitivity to existing methods. This couldbenefit high and low-income countries alike upon further research andoptimisation. ","PeriodicalId":239976,"journal":{"name":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Theglobal health crisis caused by COVID-19 has overwhelmed both healthcaresettings and economies globally. Whilst mass population testing has improveddrastically, recent reviews of existing methods have highlighted variousshortcomings with these methods. Theaim of this project was to investigate whether the LAA could be modified andutilised as rapid detection test which either matched or exceeded the existingsensitivity and specificity values.   TheLAA investigated whether the COVID-19 spike protein could be detected insamples. COVID-19 specific IgM and IgG were used in conjunction with a seriesof non-specific antigens. Control or AG containing samples weremixed with AB-microsphere complexes on glass microscope slides. Manualvisualisation identified various levels of agglutination. Light microscopy andspectrophotometry at 405nm determined that the LAA could detect at least 2.3ngof spike protein.  Theparticle counting tool of ImageJ was utilised to obtain a dataset which wassubjected to statistical analysis which indicated that there was a significantdifference between control samples and live tests, P = 0.000102 for the spikeprotein assay and P = 0.254 for the non-specific assay respectively. Theresults obtained fell in line with a similar study conducted by Buffin et al in2018. Theanalytical methods used in this project twinned with data obtained in previousstudies supports the significant difference between control values and livetest values. The LAA is easier, quicker to use (results in ≤ 30 minutes) andcheaper, with potentially better sensitivity to existing methods. This couldbenefit high and low-income countries alike upon further research andoptimisation. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发检测冠状病毒抗体或抗原的快速诊断检测方法
由COVID-19引起的全球卫生危机使全球医疗机构和经济不堪重负。虽然大规模人口测试有了很大的改进,但最近对现有方法的审查突出了这些方法的各种缺点。本项目的目的是研究LAA是否可以被修改并用作匹配或超过现有灵敏度和特异性值的快速检测试验。管理局调查了样品中是否可以检测到COVID-19刺突蛋白。COVID-19特异性IgM和IgG与一系列非特异性抗原联合使用。对照或含AG样品与ab -微球配合物在玻璃显微镜载玻片上混合。手动可视化识别不同程度的凝集。光镜和分光光度法在405nm下检测出至少2.3ng的刺蛋白。利用ImageJ的粒子计数工具获得数据集,并对数据集进行统计分析,结果表明,对照样品和活体试验之间存在显著差异,刺突蛋白试验的P = 0.000102,非特异性试验的P = 0.254。获得的结果与Buffin等人在2018年进行的类似研究一致。本项目中使用的分析方法与先前研究中获得的数据相结合,支持控制值与活体测试值之间的显着差异。LAA更容易,使用更快(结果≤30分钟),更便宜,与现有方法相比,可能具有更好的灵敏度。通过进一步的研究和优化,这将使高收入国家和低收入国家都受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Newspaper discourse: Constructing representations of terrorist groups (IRA and ISIS) Equity: Balancing certainty and flexibility to secure justice "Blurred lines" - Male experiences of work from home policy whilst raising children during COVID-19 (0-11) an interpretative phenomenological analysis High resolution analysis of anti-migratory inhibitors in high grade glioma treatment Food culture and nostalgia in the Sannong video
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1