A Postmodern Analysis of Film Adaptation of E.M. Forster’s Maurice

Dr. Taimoor Kayani
{"title":"A Postmodern Analysis of Film Adaptation of E.M. Forster’s Maurice","authors":"Dr. Taimoor Kayani","doi":"10.54692/jelle.2019.01021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores a postmodern analysis of film adaptation of E.M. Forster’s Maurice. It examines the difference between the novel and its film adaptation with the help of postmodern analysis. The research design of the study is qualitative, descriptive, analytical and applied in nature. Articles, journals, and books such as A Theory of Adaptation by Linda Hutcheon and Writing About Movies by Gocsik Karen are very helpful in postulating the analysis of Maurice. The main emphasis is made on the identification of the adaptation of source text Maurice by E.M. Forster. In order to achieve this goal, first of all, a review of the previous works that are related to Maurice in the field of Literature is taken into account. Secondly, an understanding of A Theory of Adaptation by Linda Hutcheon is taken into account. Also A Theory of Adaptation from different perspectives such as the appeal of adaptation, intentionality in adaptation, transcultural adaptation and the pleasures of adaptation. The findings of this study show the difference between the novel and its film adaptation in the form of cinematography, visual, arts, location, gender, wardrobe, costume, etc. In the novel, rather different plot is used than the film. In the film, the focus is only on the subplots of the novel for cinematography. In other words, there is a difference between the original text and its adaptation. This study is helpful for learners who are trying to learn and teach film adaptation.","PeriodicalId":127188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language, Literature and Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language, Literature and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54692/jelle.2019.01021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores a postmodern analysis of film adaptation of E.M. Forster’s Maurice. It examines the difference between the novel and its film adaptation with the help of postmodern analysis. The research design of the study is qualitative, descriptive, analytical and applied in nature. Articles, journals, and books such as A Theory of Adaptation by Linda Hutcheon and Writing About Movies by Gocsik Karen are very helpful in postulating the analysis of Maurice. The main emphasis is made on the identification of the adaptation of source text Maurice by E.M. Forster. In order to achieve this goal, first of all, a review of the previous works that are related to Maurice in the field of Literature is taken into account. Secondly, an understanding of A Theory of Adaptation by Linda Hutcheon is taken into account. Also A Theory of Adaptation from different perspectives such as the appeal of adaptation, intentionality in adaptation, transcultural adaptation and the pleasures of adaptation. The findings of this study show the difference between the novel and its film adaptation in the form of cinematography, visual, arts, location, gender, wardrobe, costume, etc. In the novel, rather different plot is used than the film. In the film, the focus is only on the subplots of the novel for cinematography. In other words, there is a difference between the original text and its adaptation. This study is helpful for learners who are trying to learn and teach film adaptation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
福斯特《莫里斯》电影改编的后现代分析
本研究对E.M.福斯特的小说《莫里斯》的电影改编作了后现代分析。本文运用后现代主义的分析方法来考察小说与改编电影之间的差异。本研究的研究设计是定性的、描述性的、分析性的和应用性的。文章、期刊和书籍,如琳达·哈钦的《适应理论》和戈西克·卡伦的《电影写作》,对莫里斯的分析都很有帮助。本文的重点是辨认E.M.福斯特对原著《莫里斯》的改编。为了实现这一目标,首先,回顾一下以前在文学领域与莫里斯有关的作品。其次,对琳达·哈钦的《适应理论》进行理解。从适应的吸引力、适应的意向性、跨文化适应和适应的乐趣等不同角度探讨适应理论。本研究的结果显示小说与电影改编在摄影、视觉、艺术、地点、性别、服装、服装等方面的差异。在小说中,使用了与电影完全不同的情节。在电影中,重点只放在小说的次要情节上。换句话说,原文和改编版之间是有区别的。本研究对电影改编教学的学习者有一定的帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Challenging Patriarchal Dominance: Jessie Burton's The House of Fortune and the Female Protagonist's Quest for Autonomy Celebrities’ Debunking Rumours and Misinterpretations: A Case Study of BTS’ Namjoon’s Letter on Weverse Through Pragmastylistic Analysis Organization of Words in the Mental Lexicon: A Psycholinguistic Study A Critical Discourse Analysis on the Variations of Language Used by Tomboy Characters in Pakistani Dramas A Corpus-Based Mechanism of Developing English-Urdu Legal Glossary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1