Integrated versus non-integrated perspectives of auditors concerning the new ISO 9001 revision

Jose Pedro Teixeira Domingues, L. Fonseca, P. Sampaio, P. Arezes
{"title":"Integrated versus non-integrated perspectives of auditors concerning the new ISO 9001 revision","authors":"Jose Pedro Teixeira Domingues, L. Fonseca, P. Sampaio, P. Arezes","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of integration of management systems is being unfolded by a great deal of companies nowadays. A crucial feature of it relates with the audit function and the integrated perceptions of the auditors. This issue is of utmost importance if one takes into account the remarkable effort developed by ISO in the last revisions (2015) of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards aiming at the standards integration by adopting a common high level structure, identical core context, and common terms and common definitions. The available drafts of the new ISO 45001 standard suggest the same effort. This paper aims, within a global research study on ISO 9001:2015, to report the integrated versus non-integrated perspectives of auditors concerning the new ISO 9001 revision based on the results from a survey conducted among IRCA auditors. It is intended specifically to assess if the perceptions from the auditors holding several certifications are different of those from the auditors that hold solely the QMS certification. Results suggest that the auditors holding several certifications foreseen more benefits from this new revision, i.e., auditors with a wider integrated perspective rate systematically higher the different dimensions assessed in this survey.","PeriodicalId":114906,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7798000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The process of integration of management systems is being unfolded by a great deal of companies nowadays. A crucial feature of it relates with the audit function and the integrated perceptions of the auditors. This issue is of utmost importance if one takes into account the remarkable effort developed by ISO in the last revisions (2015) of the ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 standards aiming at the standards integration by adopting a common high level structure, identical core context, and common terms and common definitions. The available drafts of the new ISO 45001 standard suggest the same effort. This paper aims, within a global research study on ISO 9001:2015, to report the integrated versus non-integrated perspectives of auditors concerning the new ISO 9001 revision based on the results from a survey conducted among IRCA auditors. It is intended specifically to assess if the perceptions from the auditors holding several certifications are different of those from the auditors that hold solely the QMS certification. Results suggest that the auditors holding several certifications foreseen more benefits from this new revision, i.e., auditors with a wider integrated perspective rate systematically higher the different dimensions assessed in this survey.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
审核员对ISO 9001新修订的综合与非综合观点
目前,许多企业都在展开管理系统集成的进程。它的一个关键特征与审计职能和审计人员的综合认识有关。如果考虑到ISO在ISO 9001和ISO 14001标准的最后一次修订(2015年)中做出的卓越努力,这个问题是至关重要的。ISO 9001和ISO 14001标准旨在通过采用共同的高层结构、相同的核心背景、共同的术语和共同的定义来实现标准整合。现有的新ISO 45001标准草案也提出了同样的建议。本文的目的是在一项关于ISO 9001:2015的全球研究中,根据对IRCA审核员进行的调查结果,报告审核员对新的ISO 9001修订的综合与非综合观点。其目的是评估持有多个认证的审核员的看法是否与仅持有质量管理体系认证的审核员的看法不同。结果表明,持有几个证书的审核员从这一新的修订中预见到更多的好处,即具有更广泛的综合观点率的审核员系统地提高了本调查中评估的不同维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of collaborative communication, power dependency, and price satisfaction on trust and loyalty of individual farmers to dairy cooperative case study dairy supply chain in Boyolali Supply chain collaboration: A triadic view Adoption of Near Field Communication in hotel industry based on risk perspectives and individual characteristics One's fault is another's lesson: What motivates the employees to Participate in the learning activity? Internet of things value for mechanical engineers and evolving commercial product lifecycle management system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1