The need for clarification of terminology and labels in interprofessional care: A commentary

Kateryna Metersky, Rostislav Axenciuc, Emily Mitchell, Sifelipilu Nyathi
{"title":"The need for clarification of terminology and labels in interprofessional care: A commentary","authors":"Kateryna Metersky, Rostislav Axenciuc, Emily Mitchell, Sifelipilu Nyathi","doi":"10.32920/ihtp.v2i1.1627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The current healthcare environment is filled with numerous team caring models, which are often used interchangeably, but ultimately mean different levels of collaboration among HCPs, and between HCPs and patients: multiprofessional collaboration, transprofessional collaboration, and interprofessional patient-centered collaborative (IPCC) care. Furthermore, the labels for these care models are not patient-friendly, portraying that only HCP ‘professionals’ comprise the team membership. Clarity is required around the terminology and labeling of these caring models to ensure enhanced patient involvement within interprofessional teams. Discussion: The definitions of the three team care models are provided with an explanation of how these models of care connect to the 55-year-old patient’s case and impact on the relationship between HCPs and patient. Conclusion: While IPCC care is considered as the gold standard for the collaboration between a variety of HCP professional groups and the patient, work needs to be done on the label applied to this caring model. Future research should explore, from patients’ perspectives, the labels used in IPCC care and propose an alternative title that is more inclusive of patients as team members.","PeriodicalId":231465,"journal":{"name":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Health Trends and Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32920/ihtp.v2i1.1627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current healthcare environment is filled with numerous team caring models, which are often used interchangeably, but ultimately mean different levels of collaboration among HCPs, and between HCPs and patients: multiprofessional collaboration, transprofessional collaboration, and interprofessional patient-centered collaborative (IPCC) care. Furthermore, the labels for these care models are not patient-friendly, portraying that only HCP ‘professionals’ comprise the team membership. Clarity is required around the terminology and labeling of these caring models to ensure enhanced patient involvement within interprofessional teams. Discussion: The definitions of the three team care models are provided with an explanation of how these models of care connect to the 55-year-old patient’s case and impact on the relationship between HCPs and patient. Conclusion: While IPCC care is considered as the gold standard for the collaboration between a variety of HCP professional groups and the patient, work needs to be done on the label applied to this caring model. Future research should explore, from patients’ perspectives, the labels used in IPCC care and propose an alternative title that is more inclusive of patients as team members.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澄清专业间护理术语和标签的必要性:评论
背景:当前的医疗环境充满了众多的团队护理模式,这些模式通常可以互换使用,但最终意味着不同级别的医护人员之间以及医护人员与患者之间的协作:多专业协作、跨专业协作和跨专业以患者为中心的协作(IPCC)护理。此外,这些护理模式的标签对患者并不友好,描绘出只有HCP“专业人员”组成团队成员。需要明确这些护理模式的术语和标签,以确保加强患者参与跨专业团队。讨论:提供了三种团队护理模式的定义,并解释了这些护理模式如何与55岁患者的病例联系起来,以及对医护人员和患者之间关系的影响。结论:虽然IPCC护理被认为是各种HCP专业团体与患者之间合作的金标准,但应用于这种护理模式的标签需要做更多的工作。未来的研究应从患者的角度探索IPCC护理中使用的标签,并提出一个更包容患者作为团队成员的替代标题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pedagogy of Belonging: Pausing to be human in higher education Beyond reverse innovation in healthcare: A step towards global health justice through reciprocity Inequalities in the reported impacts of COVID-19 on child health: A narrative review Amazon health: An international priority Evaluating a sexual and reproductive health education program in Mozambique: A mixed method study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1