A Study of New Chinese Cosmetic Product Registration: Focusing on Technical Regulations for Pre-Market Approval

Eun-Hye Yun, Yoon-Say Jeong
{"title":"A Study of New Chinese Cosmetic Product Registration: Focusing on Technical Regulations for Pre-Market Approval","authors":"Eun-Hye Yun, Yoon-Say Jeong","doi":"10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This study aims to analyze the impact based on the latest Technical Barriers to Trade from the Chinese government in the cosmetics industry, which is heavily dependent on exports to China, and discovers estimated difficulties to continue imports under new regulations. Design/Methodology/Approach – This study compared the cosmetic regulations and import standards of three major cosmetic importing countries. It was conducted through a literature review, especially in new regulations, Cosmetics Supervision, and Administration Regulations from China. Findings – First, it highlighted the challenges that Korean exporters face due to the different regulatory standards for cosmetics in different countries. The new ordinances required excessive information disclosure, product efficacy evaluation reports, and localization using only Chinese local laboratories. These requirements could cause duplicate inspections, leak core technology, and hinder the technological development and quality improvement of the cosmetics industry. Lastly, the absence of clarity on the basis and standards for protecting the safety data of cosmetic ingredients adds to the registration burden for companies to continue exporting. Research Implications – Korean cosmetics exporters are firmly positioned in the Chinese market with experience and world-class technology, but new Chinese Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Ordinance may impact export values. However, there is currently insufficient data to measure the impact of the ordinance. To become the world’s top cosmetics exporter, the Korean cosmetics industry needs a gradual approach to resolve China’s import regulations, and close cooperation between exporters and government agencies is essential. Future analysis may be possible with more quantitative data.","PeriodicalId":166989,"journal":{"name":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korea International Trade Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.19.3.202306.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to analyze the impact based on the latest Technical Barriers to Trade from the Chinese government in the cosmetics industry, which is heavily dependent on exports to China, and discovers estimated difficulties to continue imports under new regulations. Design/Methodology/Approach – This study compared the cosmetic regulations and import standards of three major cosmetic importing countries. It was conducted through a literature review, especially in new regulations, Cosmetics Supervision, and Administration Regulations from China. Findings – First, it highlighted the challenges that Korean exporters face due to the different regulatory standards for cosmetics in different countries. The new ordinances required excessive information disclosure, product efficacy evaluation reports, and localization using only Chinese local laboratories. These requirements could cause duplicate inspections, leak core technology, and hinder the technological development and quality improvement of the cosmetics industry. Lastly, the absence of clarity on the basis and standards for protecting the safety data of cosmetic ingredients adds to the registration burden for companies to continue exporting. Research Implications – Korean cosmetics exporters are firmly positioned in the Chinese market with experience and world-class technology, but new Chinese Cosmetics Supervision and Administration Ordinance may impact export values. However, there is currently insufficient data to measure the impact of the ordinance. To become the world’s top cosmetics exporter, the Korean cosmetics industry needs a gradual approach to resolve China’s import regulations, and close cooperation between exporters and government agencies is essential. Future analysis may be possible with more quantitative data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我国化妆品新注册研究——以上市前审批技术法规为中心
目的-本研究旨在分析基于中国政府最新的技术贸易壁垒对化妆品行业的影响,该行业严重依赖对中国的出口,并发现在新法规下继续进口的估计困难。设计/方法/方法-本研究比较了三个主要化妆品进口国的化妆品法规和进口标准。本文通过文献综述,特别是中国的新法规《化妆品监督管理条例》进行了研究。△调查结果:首先,韩国出口商面临着各国化妆品管理标准不同的挑战。新法规要求过多的信息披露、产品功效评估报告以及只使用中国本土实验室进行本地化。这些要求可能造成重复检查,泄露核心技术,阻碍化妆品行业的技术发展和质量提高。最后,化妆品成分安全数据保护的基础和标准不明确,增加了企业继续出口的注册负担。研究结果:韩国化妆品出口商凭借经验和世界级的技术在中国市场站稳了脚跟,但中国新的化妆品监督管理条例可能会影响出口价值。然而,目前没有足够的数据来衡量该条例的影响。为了成为世界最大的化妆品出口国,韩国化妆品行业需要循序渐进地解决中国的进口规定,出口商和政府机构之间的密切合作至关重要。未来的分析可能会有更多的定量数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of Logistics Efficiency and FTAs on International Trade: The Experience of G-20 Countries A Study on the Intention of Product Loyalists to Act as Independent Entrepreneurs in China’s Network Marketing Industry: Focused on the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior A Comprehensive Analysis of Customers’ Impulsive Buying Behavior in Live Commerce The Effect of Consumer Lifestyle on the Acceptance Intention of Fully Autonomous Vehicles: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Safety The Impact of Introducing Experiential Factors on Willingness to Pay a Premium at Fairs: An Application of the Contingent Valuation Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1