Assessment Shouldn't Be a Pay-Per-View Activity

R. Williams, Daniel Woods
{"title":"Assessment Shouldn't Be a Pay-Per-View Activity","authors":"R. Williams, Daniel Woods","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-0420-8.ch075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter begins with a consideration of the state of school-based assessments as an unavoidable consequence of the contemporary societal emphasis on accountability and curricular prescriptions at the state and national level in the United States of America. Additionally, the authors comment upon the potential inaccuracies inescapable in large scale, high-stakes, standardized assessment instruments, especially when such instruments are turned to the task of evaluation—whether norm- or criterion-referenced—in a teaching and learning engagement. Likewise, the chapter concludes with suggestions and templates (elaborately configured with specific activities and assessment rubrics included) to support teachers who want to develop their own, rigorous, valid, and reliable assessments instruments embedded seamlessly in student-centered learning activities, and that accommodate the reality of literacy as a culturally situated behavior that, for contemporary learners, includes all manner of meaning-making in all manner of modalities from the pencil and paper to the purely electronic (and potentially wordless, at times) video- or audio-based.","PeriodicalId":320077,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Performance Assessment","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Performance Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-0420-8.ch075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter begins with a consideration of the state of school-based assessments as an unavoidable consequence of the contemporary societal emphasis on accountability and curricular prescriptions at the state and national level in the United States of America. Additionally, the authors comment upon the potential inaccuracies inescapable in large scale, high-stakes, standardized assessment instruments, especially when such instruments are turned to the task of evaluation—whether norm- or criterion-referenced—in a teaching and learning engagement. Likewise, the chapter concludes with suggestions and templates (elaborately configured with specific activities and assessment rubrics included) to support teachers who want to develop their own, rigorous, valid, and reliable assessments instruments embedded seamlessly in student-centered learning activities, and that accommodate the reality of literacy as a culturally situated behavior that, for contemporary learners, includes all manner of meaning-making in all manner of modalities from the pencil and paper to the purely electronic (and potentially wordless, at times) video- or audio-based.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不应该是按次付费的活动
本章首先考虑以学校为基础的评估的状况,这是当代社会在美利坚合众国州和国家一级强调问责制和课程规定的不可避免的后果。此外,作者还评论了在大规模、高风险、标准化的评估工具中不可避免的潜在不准确性,特别是当这些工具转向评估任务时——无论是参照规范还是参照标准——在教学和学习参与中。同样,本章总结了建议和模板(包括具体的活动和评估规则),以支持那些想要开发自己的、严格的、有效的和可靠的评估工具的教师,这些工具无缝地嵌入到以学生为中心的学习活动中,并适应识字作为一种文化情境行为的现实,对于当代学习者来说,包括各种形式的意义创造,从铅笔和纸到纯电子(有时可能是无声的)视频或音频。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Computer-Based Assessment and Feedback The Impact of Accreditation on Student Learning Outcomes Gamification's Role as a Learning and Assessment Tool in Education Potentials and Challenges of a Situated Professional Development Model The Impact of the E-Collaborative and Traditional Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes and Anxiety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1