In vivo Evaluation of the Repellency Effects of Nanoemulsion of Mentha piperita and Eucalyptus globulus Essential Oils against mosquitoes

R. Mohammadi, M. Khoobdel, Ali Asghar Talebi, M. Negahban, M. Norani, M. Moradi, O. Dehghan
{"title":"In vivo Evaluation of the Repellency Effects of Nanoemulsion of Mentha piperita and Eucalyptus globulus Essential Oils against mosquitoes","authors":"R. Mohammadi, M. Khoobdel, Ali Asghar Talebi, M. Negahban, M. Norani, M. Moradi, O. Dehghan","doi":"10.2174/1874070702014010145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The present study aimed to prepare Nanoemulsions of Mentha piperita and Eucalyptus globulus essential oils and comparison of the repellant activity of them with normal essential oils and DEET in the field conditions.\n \n \n \n To determine the protection and failure time of the essential oils and DEET in the field condition against natural population of night biting culicid mosquitoes, 4 human volunteers participated in night biting test. GC-MS was used to determine the essential oil components and the Dynamic Light Scattering device was used to measure droplet size and zeta potential.\n \n \n \n The relative abundance of more common species captured in this study was 40.09% and 31.65% for Anopheles superpictus, and Culex pipiens, respectively. Based on the results, the protection time of nanoemulsions of M. piperita 50% against night biting mosquitoes was 4.96±0.21 h. Also, the protection for nanoemulsions essential oil 50% of E. globulus was 6.06±0.20 h. Comparison of the results showed that the protection time of nanoemulsions of M. piperita and E. globulus was significantly higher than of their normal essential oils (P˂0.01). Also, the protection time of DEET (as a gold standard) was significantly higher than of normal essential oil and nanoemulsions of M. piperita (P˂0.01), but there is no significant difference between DEET and nanoemulsions of E. globulus (P˃0.01).\n \n \n \n Due to the safety and biocompatibility of the nanoessential oils, and also relatively adequate and acceptable protection time, nanoemulsions of E. globulus and probably M. piperita can be considered as good repellents. It is recommended to do more research on these nanoemulsion repellents, as they may be good alternatives to DEET.\n","PeriodicalId":296126,"journal":{"name":"The Open Biotechnology Journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Biotechnology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874070702014010145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The present study aimed to prepare Nanoemulsions of Mentha piperita and Eucalyptus globulus essential oils and comparison of the repellant activity of them with normal essential oils and DEET in the field conditions. To determine the protection and failure time of the essential oils and DEET in the field condition against natural population of night biting culicid mosquitoes, 4 human volunteers participated in night biting test. GC-MS was used to determine the essential oil components and the Dynamic Light Scattering device was used to measure droplet size and zeta potential. The relative abundance of more common species captured in this study was 40.09% and 31.65% for Anopheles superpictus, and Culex pipiens, respectively. Based on the results, the protection time of nanoemulsions of M. piperita 50% against night biting mosquitoes was 4.96±0.21 h. Also, the protection for nanoemulsions essential oil 50% of E. globulus was 6.06±0.20 h. Comparison of the results showed that the protection time of nanoemulsions of M. piperita and E. globulus was significantly higher than of their normal essential oils (P˂0.01). Also, the protection time of DEET (as a gold standard) was significantly higher than of normal essential oil and nanoemulsions of M. piperita (P˂0.01), but there is no significant difference between DEET and nanoemulsions of E. globulus (P˃0.01). Due to the safety and biocompatibility of the nanoessential oils, and also relatively adequate and acceptable protection time, nanoemulsions of E. globulus and probably M. piperita can be considered as good repellents. It is recommended to do more research on these nanoemulsion repellents, as they may be good alternatives to DEET.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
薄荷和蓝桉精油纳米乳对蚊虫驱避效果的体内评价
本研究旨在制备薄荷精油和蓝桉精油的纳米乳液,并在野外条件下与普通精油和避蚊胺的驱避活性进行比较。为了确定精油和避蚊胺在野外条件下对自然种群的夜叮蚊虫的保护作用和失效时间,4名人体志愿者参加了夜叮试验。采用气相色谱-质谱法测定精油成分,采用动态光散射仪测定精油滴大小和zeta电位。超按蚊和淡库蚊的相对丰度分别为40.09%和31.65%。结果表明,50%辣椒粉纳米乳剂对夜叮蚊的保护时间为4.96±0.21 h, 50%金球伊蚊纳米乳剂精油对夜叮蚊的保护时间为6.06±0.20 h。结果表明,50%辣椒粉纳米乳剂和50%金球伊蚊精油对夜叮蚊的保护时间显著高于普通精油(P小于0.01)。避蚊胺的保护时间(金标准)显著高于普通精油和辣子油纳米乳(P值小于0.01),而与金球油纳米乳之间无显著差异(P值小于0.01)。由于纳米精油的安全性和生物相容性,以及相对足够和可接受的保护时间,球体乳杆菌和可能的胡椒乳杆菌的纳米乳液可以被认为是很好的驱避剂。建议对这些纳米乳液驱蚊剂进行更多的研究,因为它们可能是避蚊胺的良好替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Terminalia Arjuna (Roxb.) Wight & amp; Arn: Unveiling its Potential as a Mosquito Control Agent through Biosynthesized Nanomaterials and Computational Analysis against Aedes Aegypti and Aedes Albopictus Navigating the Nanoscale: Unraveling the Complexities of Metallic Nanoparticle Biosynthesis for Biomedical Breakthroughs and Addressing Toxicity Concerns Isolation and Characterization of Polyethylene and Polyethylene Terephthalate-degrading Bacteria from Jakarta Bay, Indonesia Isolation and Characterization of Polyethylene and Polyethylene Terephthalate-degrading Bacteria from Jakarta Bay, Indonesia Rapid In Vitro Regeneration and Genetic Fidelity Assessment of Regenerated Plants in Ayapana Triplinervis (Vahl) R.M. King & H. Robinson: An Ethnomedicinal and Ornamental Herb
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1