Is the Public Sector Wage Premium Real? Findings from Bangladesh

S. Islam, Emran Hasan
{"title":"Is the Public Sector Wage Premium Real? Findings from Bangladesh","authors":"S. Islam, Emran Hasan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3884596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the study of wage gaps between public and private sector employees is sensitive to the selection of the sample. In the context of Bangladesh, Labour Force Surveys is a dominant source of employment-related data, which is disproportionately inflated with large pool of informal sector employees. Since government jobs are highly formal, the studies on wage differentials should select the groups that are as much comparable as possible on the question of formality. However, employing Oaxaca-Blinder mean decomposition method and Melly quantile counterfactual decomposition method, we find a decreasing trend in public sector wage premium as we impose more restrictions to make the sectors fitting formal. The wage differential even disappears in the entire restriction sample, and it is slightly biased towards private in the top quantile only. Therefore, we can conclude that the superiority of the public sector job does not come from wage compensation but non-monetary issues, with a strong implication for labour markets in Bangladesh.","PeriodicalId":255350,"journal":{"name":"Economic Sociology eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Sociology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3884596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper argues that the study of wage gaps between public and private sector employees is sensitive to the selection of the sample. In the context of Bangladesh, Labour Force Surveys is a dominant source of employment-related data, which is disproportionately inflated with large pool of informal sector employees. Since government jobs are highly formal, the studies on wage differentials should select the groups that are as much comparable as possible on the question of formality. However, employing Oaxaca-Blinder mean decomposition method and Melly quantile counterfactual decomposition method, we find a decreasing trend in public sector wage premium as we impose more restrictions to make the sectors fitting formal. The wage differential even disappears in the entire restriction sample, and it is slightly biased towards private in the top quantile only. Therefore, we can conclude that the superiority of the public sector job does not come from wage compensation but non-monetary issues, with a strong implication for labour markets in Bangladesh.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门的工资溢价是真实的吗?孟加拉国的调查结果
本文认为,公私部门雇员工资差距的研究对样本的选择很敏感。在孟加拉国,劳动力调查是与就业有关的数据的主要来源,这些数据因大量非正规部门雇员而不成比例地膨胀。由于政府工作是高度正式的,关于工资差别的研究应选择在正式问题上尽可能具有可比性的群体。然而,采用Oaxaca-Blinder均值分解方法和melanie分位数反事实分解方法,我们发现,随着我们为使部门拟合正式而施加更多限制,公共部门工资溢价呈下降趋势。工资差异甚至在整个限制样本中消失,并且仅在前分位数中略微偏向私人。因此,我们可以得出结论,公共部门工作的优势不是来自工资补偿,而是来自非货币问题,这对孟加拉国的劳动力市场有很强的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulation and Resale Behavior in Online Marketplace during the COVID-19 Pandemic Involuntary job loss: welfare effects, earnings impacts and policy options Economic Uncertainty and Corruption: Evidence From Public and Private Firms Transient Dynamics of the COVID Lockdown on India’s Production Network Long-Term COVID-19 Impacts and the U.S. Workforce of 2029
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1