Critical Loss Analysis with Differentiated Products

Wenqing Li, Nathan Petek, H. Faghani
{"title":"Critical Loss Analysis with Differentiated Products","authors":"Wenqing Li, Nathan Petek, H. Faghani","doi":"10.1108/S0193-589520210000029003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When products are differentiated, applying the standard critical loss formula to assess whether it is profitable for a hypothetical monopolist to impose a common price increase can lead to delineating an antitrust market that is too broad by setting a critical loss threshold that is too low. This error is particularly likely to occur when the products exhibit very different per-unit profits, own price elasticities, and cross price elasticities. In particular, different per-unit profits are a necessary condition for this error to occur and this difference is more likely to be driven by an asymmetry in prices than by an asymmetry in costs when own price elasticities are moderate in magnitude. In contrast, differences in the quantity sold of each product do not tend to lead to errors in market definition. Given the issues associated with the standard critical loss analysis, critical loss analysis with asymmetric price increases and the gross upward pricing pressure index are practical alternative approaches for conducting market definition analysis when products in a candidate market are differentiated.","PeriodicalId":102196,"journal":{"name":"The Law and Economics of Patent Damages, Antitrust, and Legal Process","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Law and Economics of Patent Damages, Antitrust, and Legal Process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-589520210000029003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When products are differentiated, applying the standard critical loss formula to assess whether it is profitable for a hypothetical monopolist to impose a common price increase can lead to delineating an antitrust market that is too broad by setting a critical loss threshold that is too low. This error is particularly likely to occur when the products exhibit very different per-unit profits, own price elasticities, and cross price elasticities. In particular, different per-unit profits are a necessary condition for this error to occur and this difference is more likely to be driven by an asymmetry in prices than by an asymmetry in costs when own price elasticities are moderate in magnitude. In contrast, differences in the quantity sold of each product do not tend to lead to errors in market definition. Given the issues associated with the standard critical loss analysis, critical loss analysis with asymmetric price increases and the gross upward pricing pressure index are practical alternative approaches for conducting market definition analysis when products in a candidate market are differentiated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异化产品的临界损失分析
当产品差异化时,应用标准临界损失公式来评估假设的垄断者施加共同价格上涨是否有利可图,可能导致通过设置过低的临界损失阈值来描绘反垄断市场过于宽泛。当产品表现出非常不同的单位利润、自身价格弹性和交叉价格弹性时,这种错误尤其可能发生。特别是,不同的单位利润是这种错误发生的必要条件,当自身的价格弹性适度时,这种差异更可能是由价格的不对称而不是由成本的不对称驱动的。相反,每种产品销售量的差异并不容易导致市场定义的错误。考虑到与标准临界损失分析相关的问题,当候选市场中的产品存在差异时,具有不对称价格上涨的临界损失分析和总向上定价压力指数是进行市场定义分析的实用替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Critical Loss Analysis with Differentiated Products Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1