Cut-conditions on sets of multiple-alternative inferences

IF 0.4 4区 数学 Q4 LOGIC Mathematical Logic Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.1002/malq.202000032
Harold T. Hodes
{"title":"Cut-conditions on sets of multiple-alternative inferences","authors":"Harold T. Hodes","doi":"10.1002/malq.202000032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I prove that the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem is equivalent, under some weak set-theoretic assumptions, to what I will call the Cut-for-Formulas to Cut-for-Sets Theorem: for a set <i>F</i> and a binary relation ⊢ on <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>P</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>F</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\mathcal {P}(F)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, if ⊢ is finitary, monotonic, and satisfies cut for formulas, then it also satisfies cut for sets. I deduce the CF/CS Theorem from the Ultrafilter Theorem twice; each proof uses a different order-theoretic variant of the Tukey-Teichmüller Lemma. I then discuss relationships between various cut-conditions in the absence of finitariness or of monotonicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49864,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Logic Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Logic Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/malq.202000032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I prove that the Boolean Prime Ideal Theorem is equivalent, under some weak set-theoretic assumptions, to what I will call the Cut-for-Formulas to Cut-for-Sets Theorem: for a set F and a binary relation ⊢ on P ( F ) $\mathcal {P}(F)$ , if ⊢ is finitary, monotonic, and satisfies cut for formulas, then it also satisfies cut for sets. I deduce the CF/CS Theorem from the Ultrafilter Theorem twice; each proof uses a different order-theoretic variant of the Tukey-Teichmüller Lemma. I then discuss relationships between various cut-conditions in the absence of finitariness or of monotonicity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多可选推理集的切条件
在一些弱集合论的假设下,我证明布尔素数理想定理等价于我称之为公式切到集合切定理:对于一个集合F和一个二元关系∑P (F)$ \mathcal {P}(F)$,如果它是有限的,单调的,并且满足公式的切,那么它也满足集合的切。我两次从超滤定理推导出CF/CS定理;每个证明都使用了tukey - teichm ller引理的不同序理论变体。然后讨论在无有限性或单调性的情况下,各种切割条件之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mathematical Logic Quarterly publishes original contributions on mathematical logic and foundations of mathematics and related areas, such as general logic, model theory, recursion theory, set theory, proof theory and constructive mathematics, algebraic logic, nonstandard models, and logical aspects of theoretical computer science.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Walker's cancellation theorem Editorial correction for L. Halbeisen, R. Plati, and Saharon Shelah, “Implications of Ramsey Choice principles in ZF$\mathsf {ZF}$”, https://doi.org/10.1002/malq.202300024 Good points for scales (and more) Wadge degrees of Δ20$\mathbf{\Delta }^0_2$ omega‐powers Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1