Experimental Study on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Long Smooth Seal at Laminar Flow Conditions

Min Zhang, D. Childs
{"title":"Experimental Study on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Long Smooth Seal at Laminar Flow Conditions","authors":"Min Zhang, D. Childs","doi":"10.1115/IMECE2018-88717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper experimentally investigates the performance of a long smooth seal (length-diameter ratio L/D = 0.65 and radial clearance Cr = 0.140 mm) under laminar flow conditions. Tests are carried out at shaft speeds ω up to 10 krpm, pressure drops PD up to 48.3 bars, exit pressure Pe = 6.9 bars, and inlet temperature Ti = 39.4 °C. The seal is centered. Since there is no validated friction formula published for a liquid seal in the transitional regime, this paper uses San Andrés’s bulk-flow model with laminar-flow friction formula to produce predictions. Test results show that under laminar flow conditions, increasing ω decreases measured direct stiffness K, increases measured cross-coupled stiffness k, barely changes measured direct damping C, and generally increases measured cross-coupled damping c. The model correctly predicts these trends, and the predictions of K, k, C, and c are reasonably close to test results. Measured direct virtual-mass M values are normally larger than predictions.\n This paper also judges two cases with high PD or high ω to be in the transitional regime. For these cases, the predictions of K, k, C, and c based on the laminar-flow friction formula are significantly different from test results. This discrepancy further strengthens the judgment that the flow in these cases is transitional.\n For all test cases, measured leakage mass flow rate ṁ and measured effective damping Ceff are not sensitive to changes in ω, but increase as PD increases. The model with the laminar-flow friction formula adequately predicts ṁ and Ceff even when the flow within the seal annulus is at the start of the transitional flow regime. Also, Ceff predictions are lower than test results, allowing a safe margin for the pump design.","PeriodicalId":197121,"journal":{"name":"Volume 11: Acoustics, Vibration, and Phononics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 11: Acoustics, Vibration, and Phononics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2018-88717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper experimentally investigates the performance of a long smooth seal (length-diameter ratio L/D = 0.65 and radial clearance Cr = 0.140 mm) under laminar flow conditions. Tests are carried out at shaft speeds ω up to 10 krpm, pressure drops PD up to 48.3 bars, exit pressure Pe = 6.9 bars, and inlet temperature Ti = 39.4 °C. The seal is centered. Since there is no validated friction formula published for a liquid seal in the transitional regime, this paper uses San Andrés’s bulk-flow model with laminar-flow friction formula to produce predictions. Test results show that under laminar flow conditions, increasing ω decreases measured direct stiffness K, increases measured cross-coupled stiffness k, barely changes measured direct damping C, and generally increases measured cross-coupled damping c. The model correctly predicts these trends, and the predictions of K, k, C, and c are reasonably close to test results. Measured direct virtual-mass M values are normally larger than predictions. This paper also judges two cases with high PD or high ω to be in the transitional regime. For these cases, the predictions of K, k, C, and c based on the laminar-flow friction formula are significantly different from test results. This discrepancy further strengthens the judgment that the flow in these cases is transitional. For all test cases, measured leakage mass flow rate ṁ and measured effective damping Ceff are not sensitive to changes in ω, but increase as PD increases. The model with the laminar-flow friction formula adequately predicts ṁ and Ceff even when the flow within the seal annulus is at the start of the transitional flow regime. Also, Ceff predictions are lower than test results, allowing a safe margin for the pump design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
层流条件下长光滑密封泄漏及动动系数的实验研究
本文对长径比L/D = 0.65、径向间隙Cr = 0.140 mm的长光滑密封在层流条件下的性能进行了实验研究。试验在轴速ω高达10 krpm,压降PD高达48.3 bar,出口压力Pe = 6.9 bar,进口温度Ti = 39.4°C下进行。印章居中。由于目前还没有针对过渡状态下液体密封的有效摩擦公式发表,因此本文使用San andrsamus的体流模型和层流摩擦公式进行预测。试验结果表明,在层流条件下,ω的增大使测量的直接刚度K减小,使测量的交叉耦合刚度K增大,对测量的直接阻尼C几乎没有变化,而对测量的交叉耦合阻尼C普遍增大,模型正确地预测了这些趋势,K、K、C和C的预测值与试验结果较为接近。实际测量的直接虚质量M值通常大于预测值。本文还判定两种高PD或高ω的情况处于过渡状态。在这些情况下,基于层流摩擦公式的K、K、C和C的预测值与试验结果存在显著差异。这种差异进一步强化了这种情况下的流动是过渡性的判断。在所有测试用例中,测量到的泄漏质量流量和有效阻尼Ceff对ω的变化不敏感,但随着PD的增加而增加。采用层流摩擦公式的模型即使在密封环内的流动处于过渡流型的开始时也能充分地预测到*和*。此外,Ceff预测值低于测试结果,为泵的设计提供了安全裕度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vibration Absorption in a Nonlinear Metamaterial Beam Incorporating Shape Memory Alloys Mechanical Design and Development of a Payload for Structural Health Monitoring Experiments on the International Space Station Ultrasonic Characterization of the Elastic Constants in an Aging Ti-6Al-4V ELI Alloy An Experimental Approach in Defect Detection of a Single Row Ball Bearing Using Noise Generation Signal Development and Design of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber Using Magneto-Rheological Elastomer for the Weight and Power Consumption Saving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1