More Questions on Libya

Faster Times Pub Date : 2011-03-29 DOI:10.7916/D84X5J5B
Lincoln A. Mitchell
{"title":"More Questions on Libya","authors":"Lincoln A. Mitchell","doi":"10.7916/D84X5J5B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Obama administration’s decision to intervene militarily in Libya has been largely justified on the grounds that the U.S. and its allies were compelled to do this because if left on his own Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi would have killed many innocent Libyans guilty of nothing more than wanting a better life and more freedom. The general outline of this explanation is almost certainly true, but it is not entirely sufficient and leaves too many questions unanswered. Answering these questions is essential for winning enduring public support for this action, developing a strategy for winding down this intervention and for ensuring that it sets a positive precedent for the future.","PeriodicalId":389468,"journal":{"name":"Faster Times","volume":"79 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faster Times","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D84X5J5B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Obama administration’s decision to intervene militarily in Libya has been largely justified on the grounds that the U.S. and its allies were compelled to do this because if left on his own Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi would have killed many innocent Libyans guilty of nothing more than wanting a better life and more freedom. The general outline of this explanation is almost certainly true, but it is not entirely sufficient and leaves too many questions unanswered. Answering these questions is essential for winning enduring public support for this action, developing a strategy for winding down this intervention and for ensuring that it sets a positive precedent for the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更多关于利比亚的问题
奥巴马政府对利比亚进行军事干预的决定在很大程度上是合理的,因为美国及其盟友被迫这样做,因为如果任由利比亚领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲(Moammar Gaddafi)自己去做,他会杀死许多无辜的利比亚人,他们只不过是想要更好的生活和更多的自由。这种解释的大致轮廓几乎肯定是正确的,但它并不完全充分,而且留下了太多未解之谜。回答这些问题对于赢得公众对这一行动的持久支持、制定逐步减少干预的战略以及确保它为未来树立一个积极的先例至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Russia’s Non-Competitive Election Intervention and Non-Intervention in Syria Putin’s Diminishing Options Iran, Syria and Egypt The 2012 Election and U.S. Democracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1