A Western King and an Ancient Notion: Reflections on the Origins of Ombudsing

C. Lang
{"title":"A Western King and an Ancient Notion: Reflections on the Origins of Ombudsing","authors":"C. Lang","doi":"10.7238/JOC.V2I2.1256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ombuds idea has taken root around the globe providing critical protection for citizens in public, private and social sectors. Contemporary ombudsing is a unique practice which provides a rare, often fair-minded mechanism of protection for the individual with a grievance. The seeds of this modern idea may be found in ancient world cultures as well as Scandinavian history. An early version of the idea appears in a decree creating a Highest Ombudsman signed by Swedish King Charles XII in 1713, notably while he was living in exile in Turkey, during which time Sweden was in turmoil. Sometimes mechanisms for peace emerge from conflict. The modern ombuds office is often pivotal in addressing and reducing bureaucracy and conflict. As ombudsing continues to grow worldwide, as ombudsing as a human rights mechanism expands, as visitors to the ombuds office represent many world cultures, recognizing the multicultural influences and antecedents to ombudsing may deepen the international dialogue. The aim of improving governance is integral to modern ombudsing, and this aim may even be seen in the creation of the earliest Highest Ombudsman, today in Sweden existing as the Chancellor of Justice. The shift in the ombudsing function between 1713 and 1809 and thereafter, illuminates the development of the role against the backdrop of history. Early versions of the idea included protection of individuals as well as aims of good governance. For the Parliamentary Ombudsman and contemporary models, independence and integrity are core components of the office. With the growth of ombudsing across sectors, continued reflection on patterns of power, governance, accountability and culture may prove fruitful.","PeriodicalId":183832,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conflictology","volume":"36 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conflictology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7238/JOC.V2I2.1256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The ombuds idea has taken root around the globe providing critical protection for citizens in public, private and social sectors. Contemporary ombudsing is a unique practice which provides a rare, often fair-minded mechanism of protection for the individual with a grievance. The seeds of this modern idea may be found in ancient world cultures as well as Scandinavian history. An early version of the idea appears in a decree creating a Highest Ombudsman signed by Swedish King Charles XII in 1713, notably while he was living in exile in Turkey, during which time Sweden was in turmoil. Sometimes mechanisms for peace emerge from conflict. The modern ombuds office is often pivotal in addressing and reducing bureaucracy and conflict. As ombudsing continues to grow worldwide, as ombudsing as a human rights mechanism expands, as visitors to the ombuds office represent many world cultures, recognizing the multicultural influences and antecedents to ombudsing may deepen the international dialogue. The aim of improving governance is integral to modern ombudsing, and this aim may even be seen in the creation of the earliest Highest Ombudsman, today in Sweden existing as the Chancellor of Justice. The shift in the ombudsing function between 1713 and 1809 and thereafter, illuminates the development of the role against the backdrop of history. Early versions of the idea included protection of individuals as well as aims of good governance. For the Parliamentary Ombudsman and contemporary models, independence and integrity are core components of the office. With the growth of ombudsing across sectors, continued reflection on patterns of power, governance, accountability and culture may prove fruitful.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个西方的国王和一个古老的观念:对监察制度起源的思考
ombuds的理念已在全球生根发芽,为公共、私营和社会部门的公民提供重要的保护。当代申诉是一种独特的做法,它为有申诉的个人提供了一种罕见的、往往是公正的保护机制。这种现代思想的种子可以在古代世界文化和斯堪的纳维亚历史中找到。这个想法的早期版本出现在1713年瑞典国王查理十二世签署的一项设立最高司法特派员的法令中,特别是当他流亡土耳其时,当时瑞典处于动荡之中。有时,和平机制产生于冲突。现代的办公室在解决和减少官僚主义和冲突方面往往起着关键作用。随着监察工作在世界范围内的不断发展,随着监察工作作为一种人权机制的不断扩大,由于监察员办事处的访客代表着世界上许多文化,认识到监察工作的多元文化影响和前因后果可能会加深国际对话。改善管理的目标是现代监察工作的组成部分,这一目标甚至可以从最早的最高监察专员的设立中看到,今天在瑞典作为司法大臣存在。1713年至1809年及以后,监察职能的转变,说明了这一职能在历史背景下的发展。这一理念的早期版本包括保护个人以及实现良好治理的目标。对于议会监察员和当代模式来说,独立性和廉正是该办公室的核心组成部分。随着跨部门监察的增长,对权力、治理、问责制和文化模式的持续反思可能会取得丰硕成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unió sagrada: zones frontereres europees qüestionades Breu introducció a la recerca en pau transracional i transformació elicitiva de conflictes Mapatge elicitiu de conflictes: una eina pràctica per al treball per la pau El derecho como mediación transformativa de conflictos. Un enfoque transracional Educació de noies a la Sierra Leone de la postguerra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1