Human Rights and Guilt by Association

Salih Yucel
{"title":"Human Rights and Guilt by Association","authors":"Salih Yucel","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v4i3.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violating human rights, committing crimes, and mass killing due to guilt by association is as old as human beings. Most of the  genocides in human history are committed because of guilt by association. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one of the most important steps regarding human rights, however, there is no article which explicitly bans committing crime and killing due to guilt by association. Although guilt by association is considered unlawful in modern day legal systems, it exists in all cultures, among adherents of religions and nations including Muslim countries. Despite the strong objection occurring within the Qur’an, violating human rights due to guilt by association, it has been common, in both the past and present, across the Muslim world. Disregarding such important moral principles has caused great injustice and barbarous acts in the world.   \n   In this paper, I will analyse the word haqq, in its sense of meaning “right” in the sacred texts of Islam, focusing on its relation to guilt by association. Secondly, I will examine how the Qur’anic verse “No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another“[1]bans guilt by association in the exegetical works. This is shown to take on particular significance within Said Nursi’s (1877-1960) renewal approach. Finally, this paper argues that guilt by association is causing great injustice, tyranny, and crime. This study proposes that it must be added to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and banned by the UN. \n  \n[1] Qur’an, 6:164, 35:18, 53:38","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"35 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v4i3.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violating human rights, committing crimes, and mass killing due to guilt by association is as old as human beings. Most of the  genocides in human history are committed because of guilt by association. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one of the most important steps regarding human rights, however, there is no article which explicitly bans committing crime and killing due to guilt by association. Although guilt by association is considered unlawful in modern day legal systems, it exists in all cultures, among adherents of religions and nations including Muslim countries. Despite the strong objection occurring within the Qur’an, violating human rights due to guilt by association, it has been common, in both the past and present, across the Muslim world. Disregarding such important moral principles has caused great injustice and barbarous acts in the world.      In this paper, I will analyse the word haqq, in its sense of meaning “right” in the sacred texts of Islam, focusing on its relation to guilt by association. Secondly, I will examine how the Qur’anic verse “No bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another“[1]bans guilt by association in the exegetical works. This is shown to take on particular significance within Said Nursi’s (1877-1960) renewal approach. Finally, this paper argues that guilt by association is causing great injustice, tyranny, and crime. This study proposes that it must be added to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and banned by the UN.   [1] Qur’an, 6:164, 35:18, 53:38
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人权与犯罪关联
侵犯人权、犯罪、集体杀戮等与人类一样古老。人类历史上的大多数种族灭绝都是由于联想而犯下的罪行。《世界人权宣言》是关于人权的最重要的步骤之一,然而,没有任何条款明确禁止犯罪和杀人。尽管在现代法律体系中,结社罪被认为是非法的,但它存在于所有文化中,存在于宗教信徒和国家中,包括穆斯林国家。尽管在《古兰经》中出现了强烈的反对意见,即由于结社而有罪而侵犯人权,但在过去和现在,在整个穆斯林世界,这都是常见的。无视这些重要的道德原则已经在世界上造成了巨大的不公正和野蛮行为。在本文中,我将分析haqq这个词,在伊斯兰教的神圣文本中,它的意思是“正确的”,重点是它与联想内疚的关系。其次,我将考察古兰经经文“担子之人,不能担他人之担子”[1]是如何在训诂著作中禁止结社犯罪的。这在赛义德·努尔西(1877-1960)的更新方法中显示出特别重要的意义。最后,本文认为结社罪导致了巨大的不公正、暴政和犯罪。本研究建议将其列入《世界人权宣言》,并由联合国予以禁止。[1]古兰经,6:164,35:18,53:38
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Islamic Pluralism and the Muslim Voice The Application of Islamic Principles on Entrepreneurship Competence Development Framework Revisiting the Crucifixion of Jesus within Islam Evaluating Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s Views on Adherence to Islam in Heretic Analysing ‘Jihad’ Rhetoric in the Australian Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1