Submission to the Review of Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties

Elizabeth Sheargold, Markus Wagner
{"title":"Submission to the Review of Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties","authors":"Elizabeth Sheargold, Markus Wagner","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3725879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our submission is focussed on how Australia’s BITs can be modernised to ensure that the promotion and protection of investments is balanced against the need to safeguard policy space for legitimate public-welfare measures or ‘regulatory autonomy’. This discussion responds primarily to Question 4 of the questions for consideration outlined in the DFAT Discussion Paper, by providing our views on clauses that should be included in any renegotiated BITs or other investment agreements negotiated by Australia in the future.","PeriodicalId":130703,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Courts & Adjudication (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3725879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our submission is focussed on how Australia’s BITs can be modernised to ensure that the promotion and protection of investments is balanced against the need to safeguard policy space for legitimate public-welfare measures or ‘regulatory autonomy’. This discussion responds primarily to Question 4 of the questions for consideration outlined in the DFAT Discussion Paper, by providing our views on clauses that should be included in any renegotiated BITs or other investment agreements negotiated by Australia in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提交给澳大利亚双边投资条约审查的文件
我们的意见书关注的是澳大利亚的双边投资协定如何实现现代化,以确保促进和保护投资与维护合法公共福利措施或“监管自主权”的政策空间之间的平衡。本次讨论主要回应了DFAT讨论文件中概述的问题4,提供了我们对未来澳大利亚谈判的任何重新谈判的双边投资协定或其他投资协定中应包括的条款的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Case for Reparations for the Color of COVID Submission to the Review of Australia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties Functionalism, the Panel of Recognised International Market Experts in Finance (PRIME) and Epistemic Projects in International Adjudication From Courts to Arbitration: Arbitration's Confidentiality Advantage Financial Disputes in International Courts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1