Selection of R&D projects in a portfolio

Jonathan D. Linton, Steven T. Walsh, Bruce A. Kirchhoff, Joseph Morabito, M. Merges
{"title":"Selection of R&D projects in a portfolio","authors":"Jonathan D. Linton, Steven T. Walsh, Bruce A. Kirchhoff, Joseph Morabito, M. Merges","doi":"10.1109/EMS.2000.872554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A method for the analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects from a portfolio is outlined and demonstrated. It is proposed that an objective multi-criteria decision making method be used to split a portfolio of projects into accept, consider further and reject sub-groups. Next, 'the consider further' group is examined using a subjective method, the value creation model. Such an approach allows for obvious decisions to be automated and complex decisions to be given careful consideration, an approach that is more consistent with how managers commonly make select/reject decisions. The relation between research strategy and consideration of categorical data is considered in relation to the research portfolio of the Advanced Technology Division of Bell Laboratories.","PeriodicalId":440516,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","volume":"1 2-4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Engineering Management Society. EMS - 2000 (Cat. No.00CH37139)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMS.2000.872554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

A method for the analysis, ranking and selection of R&D projects from a portfolio is outlined and demonstrated. It is proposed that an objective multi-criteria decision making method be used to split a portfolio of projects into accept, consider further and reject sub-groups. Next, 'the consider further' group is examined using a subjective method, the value creation model. Such an approach allows for obvious decisions to be automated and complex decisions to be given careful consideration, an approach that is more consistent with how managers commonly make select/reject decisions. The relation between research strategy and consideration of categorical data is considered in relation to the research portfolio of the Advanced Technology Division of Bell Laboratories.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在投资组合中选择研发项目
本文概述并演示了从投资组合中对研发项目进行分析、排序和选择的方法。提出了一种客观的多准则决策方法,将项目组合划分为接受组、进一步考虑组和拒绝组。接下来,“进一步考虑”组使用主观方法,价值创造模型进行检查。这样的方法允许将明显的决策自动化,并对复杂的决策进行仔细考虑,这是一种与管理人员通常如何做出选择/拒绝决策更一致的方法。研究策略和考虑分类数据之间的关系是考虑到贝尔实验室的先进技术部门的研究组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Technology transfer in a complex environment: exploring key relationships The nature of the 21st century paradigm shift driven by the next-generation Internet Knowledge management in the professional services: lessons from functional linguistics Preventing escalation of commitment to dysfunctional marketing relationships: The unique case of customers Emergence of a new industrial paradigm: ICT supported customer service
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1