An Approach to Quantifying Operational Resilience Concepts

FEDS Notes Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.17016/2380-7172.3127
Chase Englund
{"title":"An Approach to Quantifying Operational Resilience Concepts","authors":"Chase Englund","doi":"10.17016/2380-7172.3127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper uses public data disclosed in eight bank holding companies' \"living wills\", or Resolution Plans, to examine and test how operational resilience can contribute to financial system stability. The banks, each subject to the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee (LISCC) supervisory program, interact in a complex network of Financial Market Utilities (FMUs). By employing complementary public data on operational exposures and benchmarks for operational disruption developed in existing research, we construct plausible estimates of how various disruption events would impact the financial system. This paper provides a tangible, reproducible example of how concepts discussed in recent regulatory agency guidance on operational resilience can be employed for risk analysis and scenario testing. It also demonstrates how network mapping can aid in this type of analysis. The estimates generated here indicate that disruptions stemming from tail-end operational risk events extend beyond absolute financial losses, and are likely to be large enough to pose a systemic risk to the financial system.","PeriodicalId":411218,"journal":{"name":"FEDS Notes","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEDS Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/2380-7172.3127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper uses public data disclosed in eight bank holding companies' "living wills", or Resolution Plans, to examine and test how operational resilience can contribute to financial system stability. The banks, each subject to the Large Institution Supervision Coordinating Committee (LISCC) supervisory program, interact in a complex network of Financial Market Utilities (FMUs). By employing complementary public data on operational exposures and benchmarks for operational disruption developed in existing research, we construct plausible estimates of how various disruption events would impact the financial system. This paper provides a tangible, reproducible example of how concepts discussed in recent regulatory agency guidance on operational resilience can be employed for risk analysis and scenario testing. It also demonstrates how network mapping can aid in this type of analysis. The estimates generated here indicate that disruptions stemming from tail-end operational risk events extend beyond absolute financial losses, and are likely to be large enough to pose a systemic risk to the financial system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
操作弹性概念的量化方法
本文利用八家银行控股公司“生前遗嘱”或处置计划中披露的公开数据,检验和测试运营弹性如何有助于金融体系稳定。每家银行都受到大型机构监管协调委员会(LISCC)监管计划的约束,它们在金融市场公用事业(fmu)的复杂网络中相互作用。通过利用现有研究中开发的关于运营风险和运营中断基准的补充公共数据,我们构建了各种中断事件如何影响金融体系的合理估计。本文提供了一个具体的、可重复的例子,说明如何将最近监管机构关于操作弹性的指导中讨论的概念用于风险分析和场景测试。它还演示了网络映射如何在这种类型的分析中提供帮助。本文的估计表明,末端操作风险事件造成的破坏超出了绝对的财务损失,而且可能大到足以对金融体系构成系统性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rising Markups and Declining Business Dynamism: Evidence From the Industry Cross Section Quantifying Treasury Cash-Futures Basis Trades Measuring Unemployment Risk Assessing the Extent of Trade Fragmentation Measuring U.S. Cross-Border Securities Flows: New Data and A Guide for Researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1