Considerations on the concepts of (in)equality and (dis)proportion in Machiavelli’s political thought

Victor Fiori Augusto
{"title":"Considerations on the concepts of (in)equality and (dis)proportion in Machiavelli’s political thought","authors":"Victor Fiori Augusto","doi":"10.59780/kmop5923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article intends to consider some aspects of the concepts of equality, inequality, proportion and disproportion in the political thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. I will seek to show how equality and inequality relate to corruption or preservation of republican and princely forms of government and are determined by the presence or absence of gentlemen (gentiluomini) within the political body. I will also try to evince how the notions of proportion and disproportion of power presented in Machiavelli’s text allows us to deduce that the proportion of power constitutes a necessary condition for maintaining principalities and the inequality inherent to them, but it is not the most effective way to avoid the corruption of a republic, whereas the adequate proportion of power in the governmental structure, useful for the maintenance of a republic, is ruined by the existence of socio-economic inequality. After doing that, I will observe how Machiavelli understands the difficult possibility of creating equality or inequality within a political body, theme that, by way of conclusion, I will relate to the current situation in Brazil.","PeriodicalId":123297,"journal":{"name":"Revista Inquietude","volume":"29 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Inquietude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59780/kmop5923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article intends to consider some aspects of the concepts of equality, inequality, proportion and disproportion in the political thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. I will seek to show how equality and inequality relate to corruption or preservation of republican and princely forms of government and are determined by the presence or absence of gentlemen (gentiluomini) within the political body. I will also try to evince how the notions of proportion and disproportion of power presented in Machiavelli’s text allows us to deduce that the proportion of power constitutes a necessary condition for maintaining principalities and the inequality inherent to them, but it is not the most effective way to avoid the corruption of a republic, whereas the adequate proportion of power in the governmental structure, useful for the maintenance of a republic, is ruined by the existence of socio-economic inequality. After doing that, I will observe how Machiavelli understands the difficult possibility of creating equality or inequality within a political body, theme that, by way of conclusion, I will relate to the current situation in Brazil.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对马基雅维利政治思想中平等与不平等概念的思考
本文拟对Niccolò马基雅维利政治思想中平等、不平等、比例和不比例等概念的某些方面进行考察。我将试图展示平等和不平等是如何与腐败或共和和王侯式政府的保存联系在一起的,并且是由政治机构中绅士(gentiluomini)的存在或不存在决定的。我还将试图证明马基雅维利文本中提出的权力比例和不比例的概念如何使我们推断出权力比例构成维持公国和其固有的不平等的必要条件,但这并不是避免共和国腐败的最有效方法,然而,政府结构中适当的权力比例,对维持共和国是有用的,被社会经济不平等的存在毁掉了。在此之后,我将观察马基雅维利如何理解在一个政治机构内创造平等或不平等的困难可能性,作为结论,我将把这个主题与巴西的现状联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood according to the dialectics domination and servitude in Hegel’s philosophy Arché (ἀρχή) in Hannah Arendt’s philosophy: The modalities of vita activa and the privilege of action The Husserlian influence on Max Scheler’s material ethics The symbolism of Ernst Cassirer in the Essay on man The role of language for the foundation of the moral principle in the Habermas’ Discourse ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1