Comparison of reflectance between MODIS image and simulation using radiation transfer model

Jingjing Dong, Z. Niu
{"title":"Comparison of reflectance between MODIS image and simulation using radiation transfer model","authors":"Jingjing Dong, Z. Niu","doi":"10.1109/EORSA.2008.4620296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we focus on the area covered by vegetation and compare the canopy reflectance derived from MODIS images with reflectance simulated by radiation transfer model. Instead of statistic models, physical models are chosen because of the explicit physical foundation that they possess. Two sampling areas are collected in Jiangxi province in China. Detailed information of vegetation in these two sampling areas has been measured and recorded, including leaf biochemical component content, canopy structure information and some environment parameters. And the MODIS images in this period are also collected. By combining leaf model and canopy model, canopy reflectance is calculated using biochemical component content as the input parameters. Comparison between simulative canopy reflectance and reflectance derived from MODIS images shows that, considering the whole wave length region, these two kinds of reflectance match well. At 250 m spatial resolution, reflectance from MODIS band 1 (650 nm) is higher than simulative value; while reflectance from MODIS band 2 (860 nm) is lower than simulative value. These two bands focus on the vegetation status. So the experiment indicates that satellite image weakens the vegetation impact. At 500 m spatial resolution, the band 4 (560 nm) and band 3 (465 nm) both have higher value, while the ratio between them are lower. Similar problem appears in other bands. These results are useful in physical models inversion of vegetation biochemical parameters.","PeriodicalId":142612,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications","volume":"262 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EORSA.2008.4620296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the area covered by vegetation and compare the canopy reflectance derived from MODIS images with reflectance simulated by radiation transfer model. Instead of statistic models, physical models are chosen because of the explicit physical foundation that they possess. Two sampling areas are collected in Jiangxi province in China. Detailed information of vegetation in these two sampling areas has been measured and recorded, including leaf biochemical component content, canopy structure information and some environment parameters. And the MODIS images in this period are also collected. By combining leaf model and canopy model, canopy reflectance is calculated using biochemical component content as the input parameters. Comparison between simulative canopy reflectance and reflectance derived from MODIS images shows that, considering the whole wave length region, these two kinds of reflectance match well. At 250 m spatial resolution, reflectance from MODIS band 1 (650 nm) is higher than simulative value; while reflectance from MODIS band 2 (860 nm) is lower than simulative value. These two bands focus on the vegetation status. So the experiment indicates that satellite image weakens the vegetation impact. At 500 m spatial resolution, the band 4 (560 nm) and band 3 (465 nm) both have higher value, while the ratio between them are lower. Similar problem appears in other bands. These results are useful in physical models inversion of vegetation biochemical parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MODIS影像与辐射传输模型模拟的反射率比较
本文以植被覆盖面积为研究对象,将MODIS影像反演的冠层反射率与辐射传输模型模拟的冠层反射率进行比较。选择物理模型而不是统计模型是因为它们具有明确的物理基础。中国江西省有两个采样区。测量和记录了两个采样区植被的详细信息,包括叶片生化成分含量、冠层结构信息和一些环境参数。并采集了这段时间的MODIS影像。结合叶片模型和冠层模型,以生物化学成分含量为输入参数,计算冠层反射率。将模拟冠层反射率与MODIS影像反射率进行比较,结果表明,从整个波长区域来看,两种反射率匹配良好。在250 m空间分辨率下,MODIS波段1 (650 nm)的反射率高于模拟值;而MODIS 2波段(860 nm)的反射率低于模拟值。这两个波段集中反映了植被状况。实验结果表明,卫星影像减弱了植被的影响。在500 m空间分辨率下,波段4 (560 nm)和波段3 (465 nm)的值都较高,但两者之间的比值较低。其他乐队也出现了类似的问题。这些结果对植被生化参数的物理模型反演具有一定的参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An efficient multi-scale segmentation for high-resolution remote sensing imagery based on Statistical Region Merging and Minimum Heterogeneity Rule Ground truth extraction from LiDAR data for image orthorectification Investigation of diversity and accuracy in ensemble of classifiers using Bayesian decision rules Hyperspectral degraded soil line index and soil degradation mapping in agriculture-pasture mixed area in Northern China Classification of grassland types in ibet by MODIS time-series images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1