Estimation of time to point of closest approach for collision avoidance and separation systems

J. Dunthorne, Wen‐Hua Chen, S. Dunnett
{"title":"Estimation of time to point of closest approach for collision avoidance and separation systems","authors":"J. Dunthorne, Wen‐Hua Chen, S. Dunnett","doi":"10.1109/CONTROL.2014.6915215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a method for estimating the amount of time until the point of closest approach (TPCA) between two aircraft. A range of simple methods which use derivatives to estimate the time to collision are analysed. These methods are only accurate when the angle subtended between the direction of the relative velocity vector, and the bearing of the intruder aircraft is small. An extended method is developed which calculates the exact TPCA from relative distance and bearing measurements. Representative levels of Gaussian white noise are introduced to the core equation variables for both the derivative and extended methods. It is found that as we increase the value of θ, the extended method's accuracy increases beyond that of the derivative method. A fusion algorithm is developed to switch between methods and is shown to perform well for a range of conflicts. When the relative velocity between the two aircraft is small, the signal to noise ratio on the relative velocity variable reduces causing large errors to the TPCA estimation. It is therefore concluded that at a certain relative velocity threshold, Vk (dependant on sensor and filter performance) both the derivative and extended TPCA estimation methods would become undesirable as risk estimators. It is suggested that in these situations distance could be better to use since it can be measured directly.","PeriodicalId":269044,"journal":{"name":"2014 UKACC International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","volume":"17 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 UKACC International Conference on Control (CONTROL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTROL.2014.6915215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper proposes a method for estimating the amount of time until the point of closest approach (TPCA) between two aircraft. A range of simple methods which use derivatives to estimate the time to collision are analysed. These methods are only accurate when the angle subtended between the direction of the relative velocity vector, and the bearing of the intruder aircraft is small. An extended method is developed which calculates the exact TPCA from relative distance and bearing measurements. Representative levels of Gaussian white noise are introduced to the core equation variables for both the derivative and extended methods. It is found that as we increase the value of θ, the extended method's accuracy increases beyond that of the derivative method. A fusion algorithm is developed to switch between methods and is shown to perform well for a range of conflicts. When the relative velocity between the two aircraft is small, the signal to noise ratio on the relative velocity variable reduces causing large errors to the TPCA estimation. It is therefore concluded that at a certain relative velocity threshold, Vk (dependant on sensor and filter performance) both the derivative and extended TPCA estimation methods would become undesirable as risk estimators. It is suggested that in these situations distance could be better to use since it can be measured directly.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
避碰和分离系统到达最接近点的时间估计
本文提出了一种估算两架飞机到达最接近点(TPCA)所需时间的方法。分析了一系列利用导数估计碰撞时间的简单方法。这些方法只有在相对速度矢量方向与入侵飞行器方位夹角较小时才准确。提出了一种从相对距离和方位测量中计算精确TPCA的扩展方法。在微分法和扩展法中,将高斯白噪声的代表性水平引入核心方程变量。结果表明,随着θ值的增大,扩展法的精度比导数法有所提高。提出了一种融合算法,可以在不同的方法之间切换,并在一系列冲突中表现良好。当两机相对速度较小时,相对速度变量上的信噪比减小,导致TPCA估计误差较大。因此得出结论,在一定的相对速度阈值下,Vk(取决于传感器和滤波器的性能),导数和扩展TPCA估计方法都不适合作为风险估计器。建议在这些情况下,距离可以更好地使用,因为它可以直接测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensor configurations and testbed for vehicle state estimation Detection and isolation of actuator failure for actively controlled railway wheelsets Using clickers in lectures to help identify and teach the control topics students find difficult Feedback control for reducing the pressure drag of bluff bodies terminated by a backward-facing step Cooperative source seeking via gradient estimation and formation control (Part 1)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1