Going a Step Further Than Open Access and Open Source: COVE and the Promise of Open Assembly

D. Felluga
{"title":"Going a Step Further Than Open Access and Open Source: COVE and the Promise of Open Assembly","authors":"D. Felluga","doi":"10.5325/victinstj.49.2022.0198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This articles asks if the principles of open source and open access are sufficient to safeguard our intellectual labor and to guard against the predatory logic of a world dominated by capitalist systems of production and dissemination. Both open source and open access face a similar problem, as it happens: neglect and obsolescence, as well as the most pernicious Achilles’ heel of the vast majority of digital humanities initiatives: long-term sustainability. COVE offers an alternative to both long-term sustainability and the collective sharing of content.","PeriodicalId":397139,"journal":{"name":"Victorians Institute Journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Victorians Institute Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/victinstj.49.2022.0198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This articles asks if the principles of open source and open access are sufficient to safeguard our intellectual labor and to guard against the predatory logic of a world dominated by capitalist systems of production and dissemination. Both open source and open access face a similar problem, as it happens: neglect and obsolescence, as well as the most pernicious Achilles’ heel of the vast majority of digital humanities initiatives: long-term sustainability. COVE offers an alternative to both long-term sustainability and the collective sharing of content.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比开放存取和开源更进一步:COVE和开放组装的承诺
这篇文章的问题是,开源和开放获取的原则是否足以保护我们的智力劳动,并防范由资本主义生产和传播系统主导的世界的掠夺性逻辑。开源和开放获取都面临着类似的问题:被忽视和过时,以及绝大多数数字人文项目最致命的阿喀琉斯之踵:长期可持续性。COVE为长期可持续性和内容的集体共享提供了另一种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pigtails, Prostrations, and People on Teapots: Graphic Satire and the British Encounter with Things Chinese, 1792–1842 E. G. Browne, the Persophile: Orientalism in A Year Amongst the Persians Going a Step Further Than Open Access and Open Source: COVE and the Promise of Open Assembly The Digital Dickens Notes Project Narrative Bonds: Multiple Narrators in the Victorian Novel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1