Evaluation of Single-Copy and Multiple-Copy Routing Protocols in a Realistic VDTN Scenario

Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, Algenti Lala
{"title":"Evaluation of Single-Copy and Multiple-Copy Routing Protocols in a Realistic VDTN Scenario","authors":"Evjola Spaho, L. Barolli, Vladi Koliçi, Algenti Lala","doi":"10.1109/CISIS.2016.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we evaluate and compare the performance of single-copy and multiple-copy routing protocols in a realistic Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) scenario. The simulations are conducted with the Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator. The performance is analyzed using delivery probability, overhead ratio, average latency, average number of hops and average buffer time metrics. The simulation results show that multiple-copy protocols perform better in terms of delivery probability compared with singlecopy protocol. The single-copy protocol uses the highest average number of hops and higher average latency compared with multiple-copy protocols. Maxprop achieves the highest delivery ratio and lowest average latency. Spray and wait results are the lowest for overhead ratio, but the longest for average buffer time. First contact have a short buffer time, but it uses a big number of hops.","PeriodicalId":249236,"journal":{"name":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","volume":"9 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 10th International Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems (CISIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISIS.2016.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate and compare the performance of single-copy and multiple-copy routing protocols in a realistic Vehicular Delay Tolerant Network (VDTN) scenario. The simulations are conducted with the Opportunistic Network Environment (ONE) simulator. The performance is analyzed using delivery probability, overhead ratio, average latency, average number of hops and average buffer time metrics. The simulation results show that multiple-copy protocols perform better in terms of delivery probability compared with singlecopy protocol. The single-copy protocol uses the highest average number of hops and higher average latency compared with multiple-copy protocols. Maxprop achieves the highest delivery ratio and lowest average latency. Spray and wait results are the lowest for overhead ratio, but the longest for average buffer time. First contact have a short buffer time, but it uses a big number of hops.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
真实VDTN场景下单副本和多副本路由协议的评估
在本文中,我们评估和比较了单副本和多副本路由协议在现实的车辆容忍延迟网络(VDTN)场景下的性能。在机会网络环境(ONE)模拟器上进行了仿真。性能分析使用传递概率、开销比、平均延迟、平均跳数和平均缓冲时间指标。仿真结果表明,多副本协议在传输概率方面优于单副本协议。与多副本协议相比,单副本协议具有最高的平均跳数和更高的平均时延。Maxprop实现了最高的交付率和最低的平均延迟。喷雾和等待的结果对于开销比是最低的,但是对于平均缓冲时间是最长的。第一次接触的缓冲时间短,但使用的跳数大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Model Generation of Cattle by Shape-from-Silhouette Method for ICT Agriculture Improvement of Mesh Free Deforming Analysis for Maxillofacial Palpation on a Virtual Training System A Proposal of Coding Rule Learning Function in Java Programming Learning Assistant System 3D Model Data Retrieval System Using KAZE Feature for Accepting 2D Image as Query Flexible Screen Sharing System between PC and Tablet for Collaborative Activities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1