Hedge Funds: Pricing Controls and the Smoothing of Self-Reported Returns

Gavin Cassar, Joseph J. Gerakos
{"title":"Hedge Funds: Pricing Controls and the Smoothing of Self-Reported Returns","authors":"Gavin Cassar, Joseph J. Gerakos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1498601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate the extent to which hedge fund managers smooth self-reported returns. In contrast to prior research on the \"anomalous\" properties of hedge fund returns, we observe the mechanisms used to price the fund's investment positions and report the fund's performance to investors, thereby allowing us to differentiate between asset illiquidity and misreporting-based explanations. We find that funds using less verifiable pricing sources and funds that provide managers with greater discretion in pricing investment positions are more likely to have returns consistent with intentional smoothing. Traditional controls, however, such as removing the manager from the setting and reporting of the fund's net asset value and the use of reputable auditors and administrators, are not associated with lower levels of smoothing. With respect to asset illiquidity versus misreporting, investment style and portfolio characteristics explain 14.0--24.3% of the variation in our smoothing measures, and pricing controls explain an additional 4.1--8.8%, suggesting that asset illiquidity is the major factor driving the anomalous properties of self-reported hedge fund returns. The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com., Oxford University Press.","PeriodicalId":292256,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth GFM: Capital Markets (Topic)","volume":"76 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"77","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth GFM: Capital Markets (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1498601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 77

Abstract

We investigate the extent to which hedge fund managers smooth self-reported returns. In contrast to prior research on the "anomalous" properties of hedge fund returns, we observe the mechanisms used to price the fund's investment positions and report the fund's performance to investors, thereby allowing us to differentiate between asset illiquidity and misreporting-based explanations. We find that funds using less verifiable pricing sources and funds that provide managers with greater discretion in pricing investment positions are more likely to have returns consistent with intentional smoothing. Traditional controls, however, such as removing the manager from the setting and reporting of the fund's net asset value and the use of reputable auditors and administrators, are not associated with lower levels of smoothing. With respect to asset illiquidity versus misreporting, investment style and portfolio characteristics explain 14.0--24.3% of the variation in our smoothing measures, and pricing controls explain an additional 4.1--8.8%, suggesting that asset illiquidity is the major factor driving the anomalous properties of self-reported hedge fund returns. The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com., Oxford University Press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对冲基金:定价控制和自我报告收益的平滑
我们调查了对冲基金经理在多大程度上平滑了自我报告的回报。与之前对对冲基金收益“异常”属性的研究相反,我们观察了用于为基金的投资头寸定价和向投资者报告基金业绩的机制,从而使我们能够区分资产流动性不足和基于错误报告的解释。我们发现,使用较少可验证定价来源的基金和为基金经理提供更大的投资头寸定价自由裁量权的基金更有可能获得与有意平滑一致的回报。然而,传统的控制措施,如将基金经理从基金净资产的设定和报告中剔除,以及使用信誉良好的审计师和管理人,与较低的平滑水平无关。关于资产非流动性与误报,在我们的平滑测量中,投资风格和投资组合特征解释了14.0- 24.3%的变化,定价控制解释了额外的4.1- 8.8%,这表明资产非流动性是驱动自我报告对冲基金回报异常属性的主要因素。作者2011。牛津大学出版社代表金融研究学会出版。版权所有。有关许可,请发送电子邮件:journals.permissions@oup.com.,牛津大学出版社。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flexible Prices and Leverage Il Programma di Rifinanziamento del Debito Pubblico Europeo - Perché Il Quantitative Easing della BCE dovrebbe includere i titoli governativi dell’Eurozona (The European Public Debt Refinancing Program - Why the ECB Quantitative Easing should envisage Euro-zone Government Bonds) No News Is News: Do Markets Underreact to Nothing? Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on SENSEX Returns Hedge Funds: Pricing Controls and the Smoothing of Self-Reported Returns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1