Effects of Gamified Learning Platforms on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis Taking Kahoot and Quizizz as Examples

Yinyu Wang, Yufei Qiao, Xue Wang
{"title":"Effects of Gamified Learning Platforms on Students' Learning Outcomes: A Meta-analysis Taking Kahoot and Quizizz as Examples","authors":"Yinyu Wang, Yufei Qiao, Xue Wang","doi":"10.1145/3498765.3498781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two different gamified learning platforms (i.e. Kahoot and Quizizz) on students’ learning outcomes, and to further explore their application differences in different knowledge types and disciplines. Based on the theory of gamified learning, the present study used the meta-analysis method to analyze 36 independent experiments, and found that Kahoot and Quizizz had a moderate-to-large positive effect on learning outcome (combined effect value 0.775). From the perspective of game characteristics, Quizizz's application effect is better than Kahoot's. From the perspective of instructional content, it is more effective to apply Kahoot and Quizizz in procedural knowledge learning or humanities and social sciences learning. According to the meta-analysis results, three specific suggestions are put forward to providing some reference to the application of gamified learning platforms.","PeriodicalId":273698,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3498765.3498781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of two different gamified learning platforms (i.e. Kahoot and Quizizz) on students’ learning outcomes, and to further explore their application differences in different knowledge types and disciplines. Based on the theory of gamified learning, the present study used the meta-analysis method to analyze 36 independent experiments, and found that Kahoot and Quizizz had a moderate-to-large positive effect on learning outcome (combined effect value 0.775). From the perspective of game characteristics, Quizizz's application effect is better than Kahoot's. From the perspective of instructional content, it is more effective to apply Kahoot and Quizizz in procedural knowledge learning or humanities and social sciences learning. According to the meta-analysis results, three specific suggestions are put forward to providing some reference to the application of gamified learning platforms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游戏化学习平台对学生学习成果的影响:以Kahoot和Quizizz为例的meta分析
本研究旨在探讨两种不同的游戏化学习平台(Kahoot和Quizizz)对学生学习成果的影响,并进一步探讨其在不同知识类型和学科中的应用差异。本研究以游戏化学习理论为基础,运用meta分析方法对36个独立实验进行分析,发现Kahoot和Quizizz对学习结果有中等到较大的正向影响(综合效应值为0.775)。从游戏特点来看,Quizizz的应用效果要优于Kahoot。从教学内容来看,Kahoot和Quizizz应用于程序性知识学习或人文社会科学学习更为有效。根据meta分析结果,提出三点具体建议,为游戏化学习平台的应用提供一些参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corpus-involved Education and Learning in European Universities Automatic Classroom Question Classification Based on Bloom's Taxonomy Effects of Anxiety on Active Class Attitude in E-Learning: Analysis by considering learning strategy and willingness to learn The Development and Practice of Children's Spelling Ability for a Foreign Language Learning Strategies Public University Students at the Time of COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1