Criticism and Rework of Homeric Narrative in Dio's Trojan Discourse

Giampiero Scafoglio
{"title":"Criticism and Rework of Homeric Narrative in Dio's Trojan Discourse","authors":"Giampiero Scafoglio","doi":"10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V68I0.113091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nDio Chrysostom, in his Trojan Discourse (Speech 11) rewrites the story of the Trojan War in a new and different way (with Trojans’ victory over Greeks, the murder of Hector by Achilles, and so on), in contrast with the tale of the Iliad and under the pretense of an historical reconstruction. He preys on Homeric narrative techniques (such as the selective and motivated plot of the Iliad, and the first-person tale in the Odyssey), in order to disprove the traditional version of the legend and to pave the way for a new view. Dio takes a metaliterary and intertextual approach to Homeric epics, insofar as he criticizes and deconstructs their narratives (bearing in mind Homeric criticism by Aristotle and by Alexandrine grammarians), in order to rebuild the story anew. He also provides a specimen of generic crossing, since he frames an epic subject in the context of a prose speech that belongs to epidictic oratory and that simulates some historiographical practices. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":306790,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Mediaevalia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/CLASSICAETMEDIAEVALIA.V68I0.113091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dio Chrysostom, in his Trojan Discourse (Speech 11) rewrites the story of the Trojan War in a new and different way (with Trojans’ victory over Greeks, the murder of Hector by Achilles, and so on), in contrast with the tale of the Iliad and under the pretense of an historical reconstruction. He preys on Homeric narrative techniques (such as the selective and motivated plot of the Iliad, and the first-person tale in the Odyssey), in order to disprove the traditional version of the legend and to pave the way for a new view. Dio takes a metaliterary and intertextual approach to Homeric epics, insofar as he criticizes and deconstructs their narratives (bearing in mind Homeric criticism by Aristotle and by Alexandrine grammarians), in order to rebuild the story anew. He also provides a specimen of generic crossing, since he frames an epic subject in the context of a prose speech that belongs to epidictic oratory and that simulates some historiographical practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
迪奥《特洛伊语篇》中荷马叙事的批判与改造
迪奥·克里索斯托姆在他的《特洛伊演讲》(演讲11)中,以一种新的、不同的方式重写了特洛伊战争的故事(特洛伊人战胜希腊人,赫克托耳被阿喀琉斯谋杀,等等),与《伊利亚特》的故事形成对比,并以历史重建为借口。他利用荷马式的叙事技巧(比如《伊利亚特》中有选择性和有动机的情节,以及《奥德赛》中的第一人称故事)来反驳传说的传统版本,并为新的观点铺平道路。迪奥对荷马史诗采取了一种元文学和互文的方法,他批评和解构了荷马史诗的叙事(记住亚里士多德和亚历山大语法学家对荷马史诗的批评),以便重新构建故事。他还提供了一个通用交叉的样本,因为他将一个史诗主题置于一个散文演讲的背景下,这属于流行病演讲,并模拟了一些史学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intertemporal Memories of a Shifting Unity Patterns of Relationship between Metropolis and Apoikia in Dorian Sicily Greeks Drawing Lots Unity and Diversity in Greek Art Emotional Language in Alcipron’s Letters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1