Intertemporal Memories of a Shifting Unity

Antonios S. Kaponis
{"title":"Intertemporal Memories of a Shifting Unity","authors":"Antonios S. Kaponis","doi":"10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.vi1.145251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ancient Greece, a metropolis and its apoikiai constituted a form of kinship unity. In Thucydides’ view, at least in his era, particular bonds of kinship connected the Corinthian apoikiai on, or in the vicinity of, the Ambracian Gulf with Corinth itself, and literary tradition endowed Ambracia, Leucas and Anactorion with a special cultural unity. Modern research ranging over political institutions, foreign policy, ideology, economic factors, cults, myths, calendar and burial customs has shown that these poleis regarded themselves as members of a Corinthian colonial family. Initially highly dependent on Corinthian policy during the archaic period, by the end of this period the western apoikiai had admittedly begun to diverge from a Corinthian-centred economy and to move away from Corinthian traditions. Internal social diversification also caused these poleis to move away from Corinthian institutions and habits. Nevertheless, despite various political fluctuations, western Corinthian apoikiai remained within the Corinthian sphere of influence and after Timoleon’s campaign they revived old Corinthian traditions and institutions. Indeed, other Greeks of late classical times regarded the citizens of these poleis as if they were indeed Corinthians. The area remained under Corinthian economic influence throughout Hellenistic times and memories of affinities with and ties to Corinth survived in her apoikiai. Lastly, Hellenistic monarchs and even Augustus himself took advantage of the peculiar Corinthian identity of these apoikiai for their own ends.","PeriodicalId":306790,"journal":{"name":"Classica et Mediaevalia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classica et Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/classicaetmediaevalia.vi1.145251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In ancient Greece, a metropolis and its apoikiai constituted a form of kinship unity. In Thucydides’ view, at least in his era, particular bonds of kinship connected the Corinthian apoikiai on, or in the vicinity of, the Ambracian Gulf with Corinth itself, and literary tradition endowed Ambracia, Leucas and Anactorion with a special cultural unity. Modern research ranging over political institutions, foreign policy, ideology, economic factors, cults, myths, calendar and burial customs has shown that these poleis regarded themselves as members of a Corinthian colonial family. Initially highly dependent on Corinthian policy during the archaic period, by the end of this period the western apoikiai had admittedly begun to diverge from a Corinthian-centred economy and to move away from Corinthian traditions. Internal social diversification also caused these poleis to move away from Corinthian institutions and habits. Nevertheless, despite various political fluctuations, western Corinthian apoikiai remained within the Corinthian sphere of influence and after Timoleon’s campaign they revived old Corinthian traditions and institutions. Indeed, other Greeks of late classical times regarded the citizens of these poleis as if they were indeed Corinthians. The area remained under Corinthian economic influence throughout Hellenistic times and memories of affinities with and ties to Corinth survived in her apoikiai. Lastly, Hellenistic monarchs and even Augustus himself took advantage of the peculiar Corinthian identity of these apoikiai for their own ends.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不断变化的统一体的跨时空记忆
在古希腊,一个大都市和它的apoikiai构成了一种亲缘关系的统一形式。修昔底德认为,至少在他的时代,安布拉西亚海湾上或附近的科林斯apoikiai与科林斯本身之间存在着特殊的亲缘关系,文学传统赋予安布拉西亚、莱乌卡斯和安纳托里昂以特殊的文化统一性。对政治体制、外交政策、意识形态、经济因素、崇拜、神话、历法和丧葬习俗等方面的现代研究表明,这些极地将自己视为科林斯殖民地大家庭的成员。在远古时期,西部阿波伊基亚最初高度依赖科林斯的政策,但到了远古时期末期,西部阿波伊基亚已开始脱离以科林斯为中心的经济,并开始摆脱科林斯的传统。内部社会的多样化也使这些波利斯摆脱了科林斯的制度和习惯。然而,尽管出现了各种政治动荡,科林斯西部的apoikiai仍在科林斯的势力范围内,在提摩里昂战役之后,他们恢复了科林斯的旧传统和制度。事实上,古典晚期的其他希腊人也将这些opolis的公民视为科林斯人。在整个希腊化时代,该地区一直受到科林斯经济的影响,在其apoikiai中还保留着与科林斯的亲缘关系和联系的记忆。最后,希腊化时期的君主,甚至奥古斯都本人都利用这些apoikiai独特的科林斯身份来达到自己的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intertemporal Memories of a Shifting Unity Patterns of Relationship between Metropolis and Apoikia in Dorian Sicily Greeks Drawing Lots Unity and Diversity in Greek Art Emotional Language in Alcipron’s Letters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1