A study of secure DBaaS with encrypted data transactions

Rodel Felipe Miguel, Akankshita Dash, Khin Mi Mi Aung
{"title":"A study of secure DBaaS with encrypted data transactions","authors":"Rodel Felipe Miguel, Akankshita Dash, Khin Mi Mi Aung","doi":"10.1145/3018009.3018042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of cloud computing allowed different IT services to be outsourced to cloud service providers (CSP). This includes the management and storage of user's structured data called Database as a Service (DBaaS). However, DBaaS requires users to trust the CSP to protect their data, which is inherent in all cloud-based services. Enterprises and Small-to-Medium Businesses (SMB) see this as a roadblock in adopting cloud services (and DBaaS) because they do not have full control of the security and privacy of the sensitive data they are storing on the cloud. One of the solutions is for the data owners to store their sensitive data in the cloud's storage services in encrypted form. However, to take full advantage of DBaaS, there should be a solution to manage the structured data while it is encrypted. Upcoming technologies like Secure Multi-Party Computing (MPC) and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) are recent advances in security that allow computation on encrypted data. FHE is considered as the holy grail of cryptography and the original blue print's processing performance is in the order of 1014 times longer than without encryption. Our work gives an insight on how far the state-of-the-art is into realizing it into a practical and viable solution for cloud computing data services. We achieved this by comparing two types of encrypted database management system (DBMS). We performed well-known complex database queries and measured the performance results of the two DBMS. We used an FHE-encrypted relational DBMS (RDBMS) and for specific query sets it takes only a few milliseconds, and the highest is in the order of 104 times longer than encrypted object-oriented DBMS (OODBMS). Aside from focusing on performance of the two databases, we also evaluated the network resource usage, standards availability, and application integration.","PeriodicalId":189252,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communication and Information Processing","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Communication and Information Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3018009.3018042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The emergence of cloud computing allowed different IT services to be outsourced to cloud service providers (CSP). This includes the management and storage of user's structured data called Database as a Service (DBaaS). However, DBaaS requires users to trust the CSP to protect their data, which is inherent in all cloud-based services. Enterprises and Small-to-Medium Businesses (SMB) see this as a roadblock in adopting cloud services (and DBaaS) because they do not have full control of the security and privacy of the sensitive data they are storing on the cloud. One of the solutions is for the data owners to store their sensitive data in the cloud's storage services in encrypted form. However, to take full advantage of DBaaS, there should be a solution to manage the structured data while it is encrypted. Upcoming technologies like Secure Multi-Party Computing (MPC) and Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) are recent advances in security that allow computation on encrypted data. FHE is considered as the holy grail of cryptography and the original blue print's processing performance is in the order of 1014 times longer than without encryption. Our work gives an insight on how far the state-of-the-art is into realizing it into a practical and viable solution for cloud computing data services. We achieved this by comparing two types of encrypted database management system (DBMS). We performed well-known complex database queries and measured the performance results of the two DBMS. We used an FHE-encrypted relational DBMS (RDBMS) and for specific query sets it takes only a few milliseconds, and the highest is in the order of 104 times longer than encrypted object-oriented DBMS (OODBMS). Aside from focusing on performance of the two databases, we also evaluated the network resource usage, standards availability, and application integration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有加密数据事务的安全DBaaS研究
云计算的出现使得不同的IT服务可以外包给云服务提供商(CSP)。这包括管理和存储称为数据库即服务(DBaaS)的用户结构化数据。然而,DBaaS要求用户信任CSP来保护他们的数据,这是所有基于云的服务所固有的。企业和中小型企业(SMB)认为这是采用云服务(和DBaaS)的障碍,因为他们无法完全控制存储在云上的敏感数据的安全性和隐私性。解决方案之一是让数据所有者以加密的形式将敏感数据存储在云存储服务中。然而,为了充分利用DBaaS,应该有一个解决方案来管理加密的结构化数据。即将到来的安全多方计算(MPC)和完全同态加密(FHE)等技术是安全性方面的最新进展,允许在加密数据上进行计算。FHE被认为是密码学的圣杯,原始蓝图的处理性能比未加密的处理性能高出1014倍。我们的工作让我们了解到,最先进的技术在将其转化为云计算数据服务的实际可行解决方案方面还有多远。我们通过比较两种类型的加密数据库管理系统(DBMS)来实现这一点。我们执行了众所周知的复杂数据库查询,并测量了这两个DBMS的性能结果。我们使用了fhe加密的关系DBMS (RDBMS),对于特定的查询集,它只需要几毫秒的时间,最高的时间是加密的面向对象DBMS (OODBMS)的104倍。除了关注这两个数据库的性能外,我们还评估了网络资源使用情况、标准可用性和应用程序集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integration and exchange method of multi-source heterogeneous big data for intelligent power distribution and utilization Training method for vehicle detection Pilot decontamination in multi-cell massive MIMO systems Point of sales application based on cloud computing adoption for indonesian small medium enterprise: qualitative study Calculating different weights in feature values in logistic regression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1