American VAT – The Carousel Fraud Threat: Will the EU Show the US the 'Way Forward'

R. T. Ainsworth
{"title":"American VAT – The Carousel Fraud Threat: Will the EU Show the US the 'Way Forward'","authors":"R. T. Ainsworth","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2309426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On Thursday, March 29, 2007 the European Commission, Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, will host a one-day Conference on Fiscal Fraud – Tackling VAT Fraud: Possible Ways Forward. The conference is based on the Communication of May 31, 2006 explaining the need to develop a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud. This paper indicates that the EU examination of carousel fraud points the way forward for advocates of a US VAT as well. About 40% of EU VAT fraud appears to be 'missing trader intra-community' (MTIC) or carousel fraud. The best estimates of EU losses to carousel fraud are put at 23 billion euros annually. UK studies put domestic losses from carousel fraud at 2.98 to 4.47 billion euros.Fraud concerns understandably resonate deeply among American advocates of a federal level VAT in the US. It needs to be taken into consideration that inserting a national credit-invoice VAT into the US fiscal fabric would be to set out the welcome mat for an American carousel fraud, as well as the more traditional VAT frauds. The vulnerability of a US VAT to carousel fraud is a direct result of the American tendency for national, state and local tax systems to 'piggy backing' on one another is taken into account.","PeriodicalId":376821,"journal":{"name":"White Collar Crime eJournal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"White Collar Crime eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2309426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

On Thursday, March 29, 2007 the European Commission, Directorate-General for Taxation and Customs Union, will host a one-day Conference on Fiscal Fraud – Tackling VAT Fraud: Possible Ways Forward. The conference is based on the Communication of May 31, 2006 explaining the need to develop a coordinated strategy to improve the fight against fiscal fraud. This paper indicates that the EU examination of carousel fraud points the way forward for advocates of a US VAT as well. About 40% of EU VAT fraud appears to be 'missing trader intra-community' (MTIC) or carousel fraud. The best estimates of EU losses to carousel fraud are put at 23 billion euros annually. UK studies put domestic losses from carousel fraud at 2.98 to 4.47 billion euros.Fraud concerns understandably resonate deeply among American advocates of a federal level VAT in the US. It needs to be taken into consideration that inserting a national credit-invoice VAT into the US fiscal fabric would be to set out the welcome mat for an American carousel fraud, as well as the more traditional VAT frauds. The vulnerability of a US VAT to carousel fraud is a direct result of the American tendency for national, state and local tax systems to 'piggy backing' on one another is taken into account.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国增值税-旋转木马欺诈威胁:欧盟会向美国展示“前进的道路”吗?
2007年3月29日,星期四,欧盟委员会,税收和关税联盟总司,将举办为期一天的财政欺诈会议-打击增值税欺诈:可能的前进方向。会议以2006年5月31日的通讯为基础,该通讯解释了制定协调战略以加强打击财政欺诈的必要性。本文指出,欧盟对旋转木马欺诈的审查也为美国增值税的倡导者指明了前进的方向。大约40%的欧盟增值税欺诈似乎是“社区内失踪的贸易商”(MTIC)或旋转木马欺诈。最乐观的估计是,欧盟每年因旋转木马欺诈造成的损失为230亿欧元。英国的研究表明,旋转木马欺诈造成的国内损失在29.8亿至44.7亿欧元之间。可以理解的是,对欺诈的担忧在美国联邦级增值税的倡导者中产生了深刻的共鸣。需要考虑的是,在美国财政结构中引入全国性的信用发票增值税,将为美国的旋转木马欺诈以及更传统的增值税欺诈提供欢迎。考虑到美国的国家、州和地方税收系统相互依赖的趋势,美国增值税容易受到旋转木马欺诈的直接影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
White Collar Crime - An Overview A Historical Flashback of the Formation and Development of Criminal Liability for the Legalization of Money or Other Property Acquired by Criminal Can Countries Justify the Existence of Insider Trading Laws? An Indian Perspective Insider Trading and Strategic Disclosure Securities Scholars’ Comment Letter on Draft Model Whistleblower Award and Protection Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1