Ontology Design Patterns for Representing Knowledge in the Disaster Risk Domain

A. Mazimwe, I. Hammouda, A. Gidudu
{"title":"Ontology Design Patterns for Representing Knowledge in the Disaster Risk Domain","authors":"A. Mazimwe, I. Hammouda, A. Gidudu","doi":"10.1109/WETICE.2019.00066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The success of disaster risk management efforts depends on the ability of multiple stakeholders to share disaster-related information. Semantic integration of such heterogeneous information requires ontology building. The top-down approach of ontology building has several disadvantages to knowledge representation. To support the process of ontology engineering, a bottom-up-approach that utilizes modular Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs) with weak dependencies can be used to overcome the disadvantages of the top-down approach. To bridge the availability gap of patterns for representing disaster knowledge, the study identifies existing and emerging patterns that can be used to organize disaster knowledge. Based on the eXtreme Design (XD) methodology and key informant interviews, Competency Questions (CQs) were listed from domain stakeholders. Consequently, corresponding patterns covering the CQs were also identified and developed. This study identifies emerging patterns such as Event Type ODP for representing risky and hazardous events. The QualityCausation ODP is also identified for representing the causality nature of vulnerability. The resulting patterns are aligned to the DOLCE foundational ontology and can be used to organize data in the disaster domain.","PeriodicalId":116875,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 28th International Conference on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WETICE.2019.00066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The success of disaster risk management efforts depends on the ability of multiple stakeholders to share disaster-related information. Semantic integration of such heterogeneous information requires ontology building. The top-down approach of ontology building has several disadvantages to knowledge representation. To support the process of ontology engineering, a bottom-up-approach that utilizes modular Ontology Design Patterns (ODPs) with weak dependencies can be used to overcome the disadvantages of the top-down approach. To bridge the availability gap of patterns for representing disaster knowledge, the study identifies existing and emerging patterns that can be used to organize disaster knowledge. Based on the eXtreme Design (XD) methodology and key informant interviews, Competency Questions (CQs) were listed from domain stakeholders. Consequently, corresponding patterns covering the CQs were also identified and developed. This study identifies emerging patterns such as Event Type ODP for representing risky and hazardous events. The QualityCausation ODP is also identified for representing the causality nature of vulnerability. The resulting patterns are aligned to the DOLCE foundational ontology and can be used to organize data in the disaster domain.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾害风险领域知识表示的本体设计模式
灾害风险管理工作的成功取决于多个利益攸关方共享灾害相关信息的能力。这种异构信息的语义集成需要构建本体。自顶向下的本体构建方法对知识表示有几个缺点。为了支持本体工程过程,可以使用一种自底向上的方法,该方法利用具有弱依赖性的模块化本体设计模式(odp)来克服自顶向下方法的缺点。为了弥补灾害知识表示模式的可用性差距,本研究确定了可用于组织灾害知识的现有模式和新兴模式。基于极限设计(XD)方法和关键信息提供者访谈,从领域利益相关者中列出了胜任力问题(cq)。因此,覆盖cq的相应模式也被识别和发展。这项研究确定了新兴的模式,例如表示风险和危险事件的事件类型ODP。QualityCausation ODP也被确定为表示脆弱性的因果关系性质。生成的模式与DOLCE基础本体保持一致,可用于组织灾难域中的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Real-Time SCADA Attack Detection by Means of Formal Methods Architecture of Anomaly Detection Module for the Security Operations Center Privacy Preserving Intrusion Detection Via Homomorphic Encryption A Deep Learning Framework to Predict Rating for Cold Start Item Using Item Metadata Mining Developer's Behavior from Web-Based IDE Logs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1