Systematic Review on Research Status of Workplace Violence

Yeogyeong Yoon, K. Jung-Choi
{"title":"Systematic Review on Research Status of Workplace Violence","authors":"Yeogyeong Yoon, K. Jung-Choi","doi":"10.12771/emj.2019.42.4.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Research on workplace violence has been conducted, but rarely has been organized systematically. In this study, we summarize the definition and classification of workplace violence studies and review the literature on workplace violence. Methods: Using academic search engines PubMed, Google Scholar and DBpia, we found 856 papers including “workplace violence” and “adverse social behavior” AND workplace in the title published until December 2018, and 208 papers were selected. The selected papers were classified by continent and country, year of publication, occupation, classification criteria of workplace violence, and research topic. Results: By country, the number of articles in the United States was the most with 40 (19.2%), followed by China 27 (13%), Korea 16 (7.7%), and Taiwan and Australia 15 (7.2%). By job category, healthcare workers accounted for the largest portion with 162 (79.0%) of the total, and 80 of them were conducted on nurses. Other occupations included civil servants, manufacturing workers, toll collectors and wageworkers. Among the classification methods of workplace violence, 147 (67.4%) articles were classified as type and there was a difference in the type of violence defined for each article. In the research topic, 114 (44.2%) articles analyzed the effects of workplace violence, and 105 (40.7%) articles describe the prevalence and characteristics of workplace violence, and 23 (8.9%) articles analyzing the causes of violence. Conclusion: The research topic is biased toward the field of healthcare, so it is necessary to expand to include various occupations or other specified occupations. It is also necessary to prepare appropriate measures against workplace violence. (Ewha Med J 2019;42(4):56-64) Received July 25, 2019 Revised October 10, 2019 Accepted October 11, 2019","PeriodicalId":197820,"journal":{"name":"The Ewha Medical Journal","volume":"9 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Ewha Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12771/emj.2019.42.4.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives: Research on workplace violence has been conducted, but rarely has been organized systematically. In this study, we summarize the definition and classification of workplace violence studies and review the literature on workplace violence. Methods: Using academic search engines PubMed, Google Scholar and DBpia, we found 856 papers including “workplace violence” and “adverse social behavior” AND workplace in the title published until December 2018, and 208 papers were selected. The selected papers were classified by continent and country, year of publication, occupation, classification criteria of workplace violence, and research topic. Results: By country, the number of articles in the United States was the most with 40 (19.2%), followed by China 27 (13%), Korea 16 (7.7%), and Taiwan and Australia 15 (7.2%). By job category, healthcare workers accounted for the largest portion with 162 (79.0%) of the total, and 80 of them were conducted on nurses. Other occupations included civil servants, manufacturing workers, toll collectors and wageworkers. Among the classification methods of workplace violence, 147 (67.4%) articles were classified as type and there was a difference in the type of violence defined for each article. In the research topic, 114 (44.2%) articles analyzed the effects of workplace violence, and 105 (40.7%) articles describe the prevalence and characteristics of workplace violence, and 23 (8.9%) articles analyzing the causes of violence. Conclusion: The research topic is biased toward the field of healthcare, so it is necessary to expand to include various occupations or other specified occupations. It is also necessary to prepare appropriate measures against workplace violence. (Ewha Med J 2019;42(4):56-64) Received July 25, 2019 Revised October 10, 2019 Accepted October 11, 2019
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作场所暴力研究现状的系统回顾
目的:已经对工作场所暴力进行了研究,但很少有系统的组织。在本研究中,我们总结了工作场所暴力研究的定义和分类,并回顾了有关工作场所暴力的文献。方法:利用PubMed、Google Scholar和DBpia等学术搜索引擎,检索截至2018年12月已发表的包含“工作场所暴力”、“不良社会行为”和workplace的论文856篇,从中筛选出208篇。所选论文按大陆和国家、出版年份、职业、工作场所暴力分类标准和研究课题进行分类。结果:按国家分类,美国的论文数最多,为40篇(19.2%),其次是中国27篇(13%),韩国16篇(7.7%),台湾和澳大利亚15篇(7.2%)。按工作类别划分,医护人员所占比例最大,为162人(79.0%),其中80人是护士。其他职业包括公务员、制造业工人、收费员和工资工人。在工作场所暴力的分类方法中,147件(67.4%)物品被分类为类型,每种物品定义的暴力类型有所不同。在研究主题中,114篇(44.2%)文章分析了工作场所暴力的影响,105篇(40.7%)文章描述了工作场所暴力的普遍性和特征,23篇(8.9%)文章分析了暴力的原因。结论:研究课题偏向于医疗保健领域,有必要扩大到包括各种职业或其他特定职业。还必须制定适当的措施,防止工作场所暴力。(Ewha Med J 2019;42(4):56-64) 2019年7月25日收稿2019年10月10日修稿2019年10月11日收稿
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gender equity in medical journals in Korea and this issue Sex differences in pharmacotherapy for heart failure Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER): rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use: a Korean translation Endoscopically resected duodenal lipoma as an uncommon cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a case report Disseminated cutaneous gout: a rare manifestation of gout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1