Quintilian in Europe from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century

T. Schirren
{"title":"Quintilian in Europe from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century","authors":"T. Schirren","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198713784.013.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter offers a panoramic view of the significant and diverse reception of the Institutio from the eighteenth to the twentieth century in Europe. A central figure on the European continent in the eighteenth century was the pedagogue and rhetorician of Belles Lettres Charles Rollin (1661–1741), who stressed the importance of the Institutio for education, but who also claimed that it is too long and needs to be abridged in order to be useful for Rollin’s time. Other major figures who used Quintilian’s ideas on pedagogy and the vir bonus or aspects of his rhetorical theory in various ways are the Italian G.B. Vico (1668–1744), the Scotsmen Hugh Blair (1718–1800) and George Campbell (1719–1796), the Irishman Gilbert Austin (1753–1837), the Germans Friedrich Andreas Hallbauer (1692–1750), Johann Andreas Fabricius (1696–1769), Johann Matthias Gesner (1691–1761), who produced a critical edition of the Institutio, and Johann Christian Gottsched (1700–1766). Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832) is discussed to show how his education in rhetoric through Quintilian informed his views on poetry. For the nineteenth and twentieth century, the work of five German scholars is discussed to highlight the importance of the Instutito in classical and literary studies and in philosophy: Richard Volkmann’s Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer (1885), Ernst Robert Curtius’s Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter (1948), Heinrich Lausberg’s Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (1960), Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Wahrheit und Methode (1960), and Otto Seel’s Quintilian oder die Kunst des Redens und Schweigens (1977).","PeriodicalId":331690,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian","volume":"152 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Quintilian","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198713784.013.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter offers a panoramic view of the significant and diverse reception of the Institutio from the eighteenth to the twentieth century in Europe. A central figure on the European continent in the eighteenth century was the pedagogue and rhetorician of Belles Lettres Charles Rollin (1661–1741), who stressed the importance of the Institutio for education, but who also claimed that it is too long and needs to be abridged in order to be useful for Rollin’s time. Other major figures who used Quintilian’s ideas on pedagogy and the vir bonus or aspects of his rhetorical theory in various ways are the Italian G.B. Vico (1668–1744), the Scotsmen Hugh Blair (1718–1800) and George Campbell (1719–1796), the Irishman Gilbert Austin (1753–1837), the Germans Friedrich Andreas Hallbauer (1692–1750), Johann Andreas Fabricius (1696–1769), Johann Matthias Gesner (1691–1761), who produced a critical edition of the Institutio, and Johann Christian Gottsched (1700–1766). Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832) is discussed to show how his education in rhetoric through Quintilian informed his views on poetry. For the nineteenth and twentieth century, the work of five German scholars is discussed to highlight the importance of the Instutito in classical and literary studies and in philosophy: Richard Volkmann’s Die Rhetorik der Griechen und Römer (1885), Ernst Robert Curtius’s Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter (1948), Heinrich Lausberg’s Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik (1960), Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Wahrheit und Methode (1960), and Otto Seel’s Quintilian oder die Kunst des Redens und Schweigens (1977).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从18世纪到20世纪在欧洲的昆提连
本章提供了从18世纪到20世纪欧洲对该机构的重要和多样化的接受的全景视图。18世纪欧洲大陆的一位中心人物是《百宝信》(belle letters)的教育家和修辞学家查尔斯·罗林(Charles Rollin, 1661-1741),他强调了《教育制度》的重要性,但他也声称《教育制度》太长了,需要删节,以便对罗林的时代有用。其他以不同方式运用昆提连的教育学思想及其修辞理论的其他方面的主要人物有意大利人G.B.维科(1668-1744),苏格兰人休·布莱尔(1718-1800)和乔治·坎贝尔(1719-1796),爱尔兰人吉尔伯特·奥斯汀(1753-1837),德国人弗里德里希·安德烈亚斯·霍尔鲍尔(1692-1750),约翰·安德烈亚斯·法布里修斯(1696-1769),约翰·马蒂亚斯·格斯纳(1691-1761),他出版了《机构》的批判版,约翰·克里斯蒂安·戈特切德(1700-1766)。本文讨论了约翰·沃尔夫冈·冯·歌德(1749-1832),以说明他是如何通过昆提连的修辞学教育来影响他对诗歌的看法的。在19世纪和20世纪,五位德国学者的工作被讨论,以突出研究所在古典和文学研究以及哲学的重要性:理查德·沃尔克曼的《哲学修辞》Römer(1885),恩斯特·罗伯特·柯提乌斯的《文学与晚期哲学》Europäische(1948),海因里希·劳斯伯格的《文学修辞手册》(1960),汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔的《哲学与方法论》(1960),奥托·希尔的《昆提利亚式的《艺术与艺术》(1977)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Structure and Contents of the Institutio oratoria Quintilian’s Underlying Educational Programme Quintilian in Europe from the Eighteenth to the Twentieth Century Quintilian in the Italian Renaissance Modern Assessments of Quintilian
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1