Interreligious Learning as Monotheist Imperative

Reuven Firestone
{"title":"Interreligious Learning as Monotheist Imperative","authors":"Reuven Firestone","doi":"10.1163/9789004420045_004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because seminaries are designed to further the goals of the religious communities that fund and support them, interreligious learning may not be generally accepted as fulfilling their institutional needs. This perspective derives from the history of interreligious polemic and competition between and within monotheist traditions, based on the assumption that God represents a single Truth that cannot be compromised, and that our expression of religion represents that Truth. This essay interrogates these assumptions and argues that true understanding must transcend the limits of religious institution, and offers an instructive way to understand the distinctiveness of one’s particular spiritual tradition in relation to other attempts to understand the Infinite","PeriodicalId":164837,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on Interreligious Education","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on Interreligious Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004420045_004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Because seminaries are designed to further the goals of the religious communities that fund and support them, interreligious learning may not be generally accepted as fulfilling their institutional needs. This perspective derives from the history of interreligious polemic and competition between and within monotheist traditions, based on the assumption that God represents a single Truth that cannot be compromised, and that our expression of religion represents that Truth. This essay interrogates these assumptions and argues that true understanding must transcend the limits of religious institution, and offers an instructive way to understand the distinctiveness of one’s particular spiritual tradition in relation to other attempts to understand the Infinite
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为一神教当务之急的跨宗教学习
因为神学院是为了促进资助和支持他们的宗教团体的目标而设计的,宗教间的学习可能不会被普遍接受为满足他们的机构需求。这种观点源于一神教传统之间和内部的宗教间争论和竞争的历史,基于这样的假设,即上帝代表着一个不可妥协的单一真理,而我们对宗教的表达代表着这一真理。这篇文章质疑了这些假设,并认为真正的理解必须超越宗教制度的限制,并提供了一种有启发性的方式来理解一个人的特定精神传统与其他理解无限的尝试的独特性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
God’s Mercy is Broader than This: Theological Sensibilities and Interreligious Theological Education Reflections on Islamic Studies in an Interreligious Context Interreligious Education: Transnational and Trans-Spiritual Identity Formation in the Classroom Teaching African American Religious Pluralism Reflections in the Waves: What Interreligious Studies can Learn from Women’s Movements in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1