The Racialization of the African-American and Asian-American Citizen: A Comparative Legal Analysis

Mallory Yung
{"title":"The Racialization of the African-American and Asian-American Citizen: A Comparative Legal Analysis","authors":"Mallory Yung","doi":"10.15353/LSUJ.V3I0.433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nThe perception of racial tensions in North American settler countries has historically been focused on the Black/White relationship, as has much of the theoretical legal discourse surrounding the concept of “race”. Accordingly, the scope of much critical race scholarship has been restricted such that it rarely acknowledges the racial tensions that persist between different racially-excluded minorities. This paper hopes to expand and integrate the examination of Black and Asian-American racialization that critical race scholars have previously revealed. It will do this by historicizing the respective contours of Black and Asian-American racialization processes through legislation and landmark court cases in a neo-colonial context. The defining features of racialization which have culminated in the ultimate divergence of each group’s racialization will be compared and contrasted. This divergence sees the differential labeling of Asian-Americans as the ‘model minority’ while Blacks continue to be subjugated by modern modalities of exclusionary systems of control. The consequences of this divergence in relation to preserving existing racial and social hierarchies will be discussed in the final sections of this paper. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":369563,"journal":{"name":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","volume":"176 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15353/LSUJ.V3I0.433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The perception of racial tensions in North American settler countries has historically been focused on the Black/White relationship, as has much of the theoretical legal discourse surrounding the concept of “race”. Accordingly, the scope of much critical race scholarship has been restricted such that it rarely acknowledges the racial tensions that persist between different racially-excluded minorities. This paper hopes to expand and integrate the examination of Black and Asian-American racialization that critical race scholars have previously revealed. It will do this by historicizing the respective contours of Black and Asian-American racialization processes through legislation and landmark court cases in a neo-colonial context. The defining features of racialization which have culminated in the ultimate divergence of each group’s racialization will be compared and contrasted. This divergence sees the differential labeling of Asian-Americans as the ‘model minority’ while Blacks continue to be subjugated by modern modalities of exclusionary systems of control. The consequences of this divergence in relation to preserving existing racial and social hierarchies will be discussed in the final sections of this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非裔美国人和亚裔美国公民的种族化:一个比较的法律分析
历史上,北美移民国家对种族紧张关系的看法一直集中在黑人/白人关系上,围绕“种族”概念的许多理论法律论述也是如此。因此,许多批判性种族研究的范围受到限制,以至于很少承认不同种族被排斥的少数民族之间持续存在的种族紧张关系。本文希望扩展和整合批判性种族学者先前揭示的对黑人和亚裔美国人种族化的研究。它将在新殖民主义背景下,通过立法和具有里程碑意义的法庭案件,将黑人和亚裔美国人种族化过程的各自轮廓历史化。将比较和对比种族化的决定性特征,这些特征最终导致了每个群体的种族化的最终分歧。在这种分歧中,亚裔美国人被贴上了“模范少数族裔”的标签,而黑人则继续被现代排他性控制体系所征服。这种分歧对维持现有种族和社会等级制度的影响将在本文的最后几节中讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Legal Studies Undergraduate Journal Volume 3 Redefining “Family” and Reconstructing Child Custody in Canada The Racialization of the African-American and Asian-American Citizen: A Comparative Legal Analysis The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child: The Good, the Bad, and the Useless Rights, Authority, and Workability: An Examination of Universal Jurisdiction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1