One-Minute Paper (OMP) as a Formative Assessment

Fritz Stephen Dadula Solamo
{"title":"One-Minute Paper (OMP) as a Formative Assessment","authors":"Fritz Stephen Dadula Solamo","doi":"10.23887/ijerr.v5i2.48248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the teaching process, several daily quiz points cannot guarantee an increase in the level of student understanding because it may be caused by different factors, one of which is the formative assessment applied to students who are not effective. The aims of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of a One-Minute Paper (OMP) as a formative assessment contribute meaningfully to increasing the scores of ninth grade of students on their summative assessment. This action research employed a quasi-experimental pre/post-test design. Subject of this study consist of fourteen students who were classified as experimental group who participated in the teacher-led discussion with the integration of one-minute paper as their formative assessment. The data obtain using open-ended question. Feedback-giving on the next day of class were done as part of the intervention. The result of study show a comparison group with fourteen students who were classified as control group had done the traditional way of formative assessment – the quiz. Both groups fall in the accepted region at 5% level of significance with mean gains of 9 and 6, respectively. It was revealed that the two methods were effective in increasing the scores of the students due to their higher mean scores. However, the experimental group’s mean gain score and mean percentage score (MPS) were significantly higher than the comparison group; thus, one-minute paper is more effective than quiz as a formative assessment.","PeriodicalId":107037,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v5i2.48248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the teaching process, several daily quiz points cannot guarantee an increase in the level of student understanding because it may be caused by different factors, one of which is the formative assessment applied to students who are not effective. The aims of this study is to analyse the effectiveness of a One-Minute Paper (OMP) as a formative assessment contribute meaningfully to increasing the scores of ninth grade of students on their summative assessment. This action research employed a quasi-experimental pre/post-test design. Subject of this study consist of fourteen students who were classified as experimental group who participated in the teacher-led discussion with the integration of one-minute paper as their formative assessment. The data obtain using open-ended question. Feedback-giving on the next day of class were done as part of the intervention. The result of study show a comparison group with fourteen students who were classified as control group had done the traditional way of formative assessment – the quiz. Both groups fall in the accepted region at 5% level of significance with mean gains of 9 and 6, respectively. It was revealed that the two methods were effective in increasing the scores of the students due to their higher mean scores. However, the experimental group’s mean gain score and mean percentage score (MPS) were significantly higher than the comparison group; thus, one-minute paper is more effective than quiz as a formative assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一分钟纸(OMP)作为形成性评估
在教学过程中,每天几个小测验点并不能保证学生理解水平的提高,因为这可能是由不同的因素造成的,其中一个原因就是对那些没有效果的学生进行形成性评价。本研究的目的是分析一分钟纸(OMP)作为一种形成性评估对提高九年级学生总结性评估成绩的有效性。本行动研究采用准实验前/后测试设计。本研究的研究对象为14名学生,他们被划分为实验组,参与教师主导的讨论,以一分钟的论文作为他们的形成性评估。数据采用开放式问题获取。第二天课堂上的反馈是干预的一部分。研究结果表明,对照组的14名学生采用了传统的形成性评估方法——测验。两组均落在可接受区域内,显著性水平为5%,平均增益分别为9和6。结果表明,由于学生的平均成绩较高,这两种方法对提高学生的成绩是有效的。但实验组的平均增重评分和平均百分比评分(MPS)显著高于对照组;因此,作为形成性评估,一分钟的论文比测验更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Moderation Effect of Role Ambiguity in Relationship of Role Conflict and Occupational Stress After Covid-19 Science Teachers' Perceptions of Web-Based Learning Raising Students’ Awareness on Environmental Education Issues Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Solving Mathematical Problems: Systematic Literature Review The Effectiveness of RME Approach to Elementary School Students' Mathematical Abilities: A Meta-Analysis Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1