Gardening as Activism: Cultivating Human Minds in A Gardener in Wasteland

A. Sen
{"title":"Gardening as Activism: Cultivating Human Minds in A Gardener in Wasteland","authors":"A. Sen","doi":"10.22492/ijah.10.1.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jotiba Phule’s Gulamgiri (1873), which is widely translated as Slavery, equates casteism with slavery. His book carefully deconstructs the Vedic scriptures, which make up the largest chunk of central religious texts in Hinduism, in order to expose the latent hypocrisy and the conspiracy of Brahminical ideology to dominate a section of society. Gulamgiri was the radical manifesto of the social reform society called Satyasodhak Samaj, founded by Phule in 1873 along with his wife Savitribai Phule. Aparajita Ninan and Srividya Natarajan’s graphic novel A Gardener in the Wasteland: Jotiba Phule’s Fight for Liberty (2011), by revisiting Jotiba Phule’s ground-breaking text Gulamgiri, examines the contemporaneity and the continuity of caste issues and thus attempts a conversation between the past and the present historical reality of casteism. The present study focuses on the centrality of the metaphor of the garden in highlighting the gravity of the caste problem and its larger implications in the lives of India’s marginalised Dalit community. By focusing on the physical aspects of gardening, this paper touches upon Dalit eco-literary concerns and brings to the fore the role of labour that defines the relationship between Dalit bodies and nature. It also aims to capture Natarajan and Ninan’s contribution to Phule’s task of metaphorical gardening, thus becoming co-gardeners in distant time and space.","PeriodicalId":270323,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/ijah.10.1.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Jotiba Phule’s Gulamgiri (1873), which is widely translated as Slavery, equates casteism with slavery. His book carefully deconstructs the Vedic scriptures, which make up the largest chunk of central religious texts in Hinduism, in order to expose the latent hypocrisy and the conspiracy of Brahminical ideology to dominate a section of society. Gulamgiri was the radical manifesto of the social reform society called Satyasodhak Samaj, founded by Phule in 1873 along with his wife Savitribai Phule. Aparajita Ninan and Srividya Natarajan’s graphic novel A Gardener in the Wasteland: Jotiba Phule’s Fight for Liberty (2011), by revisiting Jotiba Phule’s ground-breaking text Gulamgiri, examines the contemporaneity and the continuity of caste issues and thus attempts a conversation between the past and the present historical reality of casteism. The present study focuses on the centrality of the metaphor of the garden in highlighting the gravity of the caste problem and its larger implications in the lives of India’s marginalised Dalit community. By focusing on the physical aspects of gardening, this paper touches upon Dalit eco-literary concerns and brings to the fore the role of labour that defines the relationship between Dalit bodies and nature. It also aims to capture Natarajan and Ninan’s contribution to Phule’s task of metaphorical gardening, thus becoming co-gardeners in distant time and space.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
作为行动主义的园艺:《荒原上的园丁》中人类心灵的培养
Jotiba Phule的《Gulamgiri》(1873)被广泛翻译为奴隶制,将种姓制度与奴隶制等同起来。他的书仔细地解构了吠陀经典,吠陀经典构成了印度教核心宗教文本的最大部分,以揭露婆罗门意识形态统治社会一部分的潜在虚伪和阴谋。Gulamgiri是社会改革组织Satyasodhak Samaj的激进宣言,由Phule和他的妻子Savitribai Phule于1873年创立。Aparajita Ninan和Srividya Natarajan的图画小说《荒地上的园丁:Jotiba Phule为自由而战》(2011),通过重新审视Jotiba Phule的开创性文本《Gulamgiri》,审视了种姓问题的当代性和连续性,从而尝试在过去和现在的种姓制度历史现实之间进行对话。本研究着重于花园隐喻的中心地位,强调种姓问题的严重性及其对印度边缘化达利特社区生活的更大影响。通过关注园艺的物理方面,本文触及了达利特生态文学的关注,并将定义达利特身体与自然之间关系的劳动角色带到前台。它还旨在捕捉Natarajan和Ninan对Phule的隐喻园艺任务的贡献,从而成为遥远时空的共同园丁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Turbulence of the Fin-de-siècle: Arts Through the Looking-Glass of Intermediality Gardening as Activism: Cultivating Human Minds in A Gardener in Wasteland A Structural Analysis of Religious Legends about an Iconic Image in the Philippines Memory and Identity in Haruki Murakami’s Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage The Significance of Colour Symbolisms in Angela Carter’s The Bloody Chamber (1979)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1