IoT Standardization - The Approach in the Field of Data Protection as a Model for Ensuring Compliance of IoT Applications?

K. Stuurman, Irene Kamara
{"title":"IoT Standardization - The Approach in the Field of Data Protection as a Model for Ensuring Compliance of IoT Applications?","authors":"K. Stuurman, Irene Kamara","doi":"10.1109/W-FiCloud.2016.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The IoT applications will have an unprecedented influence on our private and professional lives. IoT promises, next to advanced machine-to-machine interaction, delivery of a next level of man-to-machine communication based on a smart, global communications infrastructure. One of the characteristics setting the IoT apart is a broad range of critical issues that can be associated with the use, and hence development of IoT applications. Next to data protection and security issues, this could include ethics, responsibility, liability, insurance, accountability and autonomy, to issues relating to conditions for market access. To the extent standards play a role, it is of utmost importance to choose the right regulatory model, given the fundamental issues at stake. The existing New Approach, being the dominant regulatory model for applying standards in relation to EU product legislation, has been criticized for lacking legitimacy of standard-setting procedures and lacking judicial review. The global nature of IoT standardization will put further pressure on the role of the European Standardization System and give rise to further concerns regarding these issues. Recently, the General Data Protection Regulation, a legal instrument to regulate the processing of personal data, was adopted in the European Union. The Regulation endorses standardization, both explicitly and implicitly, but in a different way from the New Approach model. One could speak of a 'data protection model' in that respect, given the 'sensitive' nature of data protection on the one hand and ethics, liability, accountability issues in the IoT context on the other, the new model might prove to be appropriate for using standards in regulating those critical issues as well.","PeriodicalId":441441,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE 4th International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud Workshops (FiCloudW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/W-FiCloud.2016.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The IoT applications will have an unprecedented influence on our private and professional lives. IoT promises, next to advanced machine-to-machine interaction, delivery of a next level of man-to-machine communication based on a smart, global communications infrastructure. One of the characteristics setting the IoT apart is a broad range of critical issues that can be associated with the use, and hence development of IoT applications. Next to data protection and security issues, this could include ethics, responsibility, liability, insurance, accountability and autonomy, to issues relating to conditions for market access. To the extent standards play a role, it is of utmost importance to choose the right regulatory model, given the fundamental issues at stake. The existing New Approach, being the dominant regulatory model for applying standards in relation to EU product legislation, has been criticized for lacking legitimacy of standard-setting procedures and lacking judicial review. The global nature of IoT standardization will put further pressure on the role of the European Standardization System and give rise to further concerns regarding these issues. Recently, the General Data Protection Regulation, a legal instrument to regulate the processing of personal data, was adopted in the European Union. The Regulation endorses standardization, both explicitly and implicitly, but in a different way from the New Approach model. One could speak of a 'data protection model' in that respect, given the 'sensitive' nature of data protection on the one hand and ethics, liability, accountability issues in the IoT context on the other, the new model might prove to be appropriate for using standards in regulating those critical issues as well.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
物联网标准化——数据保护领域的方法作为确保物联网应用合规性的模型?
物联网应用将对我们的私人生活和职业生活产生前所未有的影响。物联网承诺,除了先进的机器对机器交互之外,还将提供基于智能全球通信基础设施的下一级人机通信。使物联网与众不同的特征之一是与物联网应用的使用和开发相关的广泛关键问题。除了数据保护和安全问题,这可能包括道德、责任、责任、保险、问责制和自主权,以及与市场准入条件有关的问题。就标准发挥作用的程度而言,选择正确的监管模式至关重要,因为这涉及到一些根本问题。现有的新方法作为欧盟产品立法中应用标准的主要监管模式,因缺乏标准制定程序的合法性和缺乏司法审查而受到批评。物联网标准化的全球性将对欧洲标准化体系的作用施加进一步的压力,并引起对这些问题的进一步关注。最近,欧盟通过了《一般数据保护条例》,这是一项规范个人数据处理的法律文书。《条例》明确和含蓄地支持标准化,但方式不同于《新办法》模式。在这方面,人们可以称之为“数据保护模型”,一方面考虑到数据保护的“敏感”性质,另一方面考虑到物联网背景下的道德、责任、问责问题,新模型可能被证明适用于使用标准来规范这些关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Social Network Analysis of Tweets during the Gaza War, Summer 2014 IoT Standardization - The Approach in the Field of Data Protection as a Model for Ensuring Compliance of IoT Applications? A Survey on Network Security Monitoring Systems Smart Mobile-Based Emergency Management and Notification System Investigating Metrics to Build a Benchmark Tool for Complex Event Processing Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1