Systematic literature review on the utilization of theoretical underpinnings in virtual exchange research

Liz Dovrat
{"title":"Systematic literature review on the utilization of theoretical underpinnings in virtual exchange research","authors":"Liz Dovrat","doi":"10.21827/jve.5.38444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual Exchange (VE) research is a subset of the technology enhanced learning field that has grown exponentially in the last decade. A critical step in the growth of an emerging academic field is to reflect on past research to understand what has been done well and what can be improved. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) contributes to this reflective process by examining if a common criticism of technology enhanced learning research in Higher Education (HE) – the under-utilization of theoretical underpinnings in research – extends to the niche field of VE research. Using a qualitative meta-synthesis methodology, 42 qualitative and mixed method articles on VE were analyzed for theoretical underpinning usage, application, and advancement. Almost half of the articles explicitly used theoretical underpinnings in the conceptualization, data collection and analysis, and discussion of results. About a third of the articles explicitly used theoretical underpinnings in the design of the VE, but not necessarily in the research design. No articles reported adding to or advancing current theoretical underpinnings nor creating new ones. The results of this study show VE research is maturing but is not yet fully mature in the application of theoretical underpinnings in research. Also, this study contributes to analysis of theoretical underpinning usage by demonstrating that theoretical underpinnings are utilized also in course design, not just research design.","PeriodicalId":107205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Virtual Exchange","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Virtual Exchange","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/jve.5.38444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Virtual Exchange (VE) research is a subset of the technology enhanced learning field that has grown exponentially in the last decade. A critical step in the growth of an emerging academic field is to reflect on past research to understand what has been done well and what can be improved. This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) contributes to this reflective process by examining if a common criticism of technology enhanced learning research in Higher Education (HE) – the under-utilization of theoretical underpinnings in research – extends to the niche field of VE research. Using a qualitative meta-synthesis methodology, 42 qualitative and mixed method articles on VE were analyzed for theoretical underpinning usage, application, and advancement. Almost half of the articles explicitly used theoretical underpinnings in the conceptualization, data collection and analysis, and discussion of results. About a third of the articles explicitly used theoretical underpinnings in the design of the VE, but not necessarily in the research design. No articles reported adding to or advancing current theoretical underpinnings nor creating new ones. The results of this study show VE research is maturing but is not yet fully mature in the application of theoretical underpinnings in research. Also, this study contributes to analysis of theoretical underpinning usage by demonstrating that theoretical underpinnings are utilized also in course design, not just research design.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对虚拟交换研究中理论基础运用的系统文献综述
虚拟交换(VE)研究是技术增强学习领域的一个子集,在过去十年中呈指数级增长。一个新兴学术领域成长的关键一步是反思过去的研究,了解哪些做得好,哪些可以改进。本系统性文献综述(SLR)通过考察对高等教育(HE)中技术促进学习研究的普遍批评——研究中理论基础的利用不足——是否延伸到高等教育研究的利基领域,为这一反思过程做出了贡献。采用定性元综合方法,对42篇定性和混合方法的VE论文进行了理论基础、应用和进展分析。几乎一半的文章明确地在概念化、数据收集和分析以及结果讨论中使用了理论基础。大约三分之一的文章明确地在VE的设计中使用了理论基础,但不一定在研究设计中使用。没有文章报道增加或推进了当前的理论基础,也没有创造新的理论基础。本研究结果表明,VE研究正在走向成熟,但理论基础在研究中的应用尚未完全成熟。此外,本研究也有助于分析理论基础的使用,证明理论基础也可用于课程设计,而不仅仅是研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining virtual exchange with challenge-based learning: the experience of the “Virtual Environmental Challenge” Developing transferable skills in virtual exchange Identity, racial cognizance, and intercultural competence: Students’ collective identities in the virtual literary classroom Implementation of COIL in mental health education: Outcomes of a collaboration between Spain and the United States nursing students Pedagogical mentoring in virtual exchange: Developing students’ videoconferencing skills
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1