Board Independence in India: From Form to Function?

Vikramaditya S. Khanna, Umakanth Varottil
{"title":"Board Independence in India: From Form to Function?","authors":"Vikramaditya S. Khanna, Umakanth Varottil","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2752401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explore the application and evolution of board independence in India, where concentration of shareholdings in public companies is the norm, what effects it has had, and how one might make the best use of the board independence concept in the Indian environment. Following India’s liberalization in the early 1990s, the first foray into board independence came in the form of a voluntary code recommended by the Confederation of Indian Industry, which was later on adopted in a revised form by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a mandatory requirement. This formal phase was influenced by developments around the world, thereby displaying signs of a legal transplant. However, we argue that the formal independence requirements gave rise to considerable doubts as to the functional impact of independent directors.We also discuss the most recent set of reforms to corporate law in India which are moving away from the earlier conception of board independence imported into India and towards greater functionality by adapting the concept to the environment in India. A new legislation, the Companies Act, 2013, provides extensive powers and responsibilities and imposes significant liabilities on independent directors that transform their role to one that emphasizes monitoring. Interestingly, this transformation in India is not the result of international developments, such as the global financial crisis, that called into question the role of independent directors, but the result of internal systemic shocks due to local corporate governance scandals. Although these steps are positive, much is still required before board independence becomes more effective in India. We conclude with some suggested reforms that may further push the board independence concept towards greater effectiveness in India.","PeriodicalId":440695,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Actors & Players eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Actors & Players eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2752401","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper we explore the application and evolution of board independence in India, where concentration of shareholdings in public companies is the norm, what effects it has had, and how one might make the best use of the board independence concept in the Indian environment. Following India’s liberalization in the early 1990s, the first foray into board independence came in the form of a voluntary code recommended by the Confederation of Indian Industry, which was later on adopted in a revised form by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) as a mandatory requirement. This formal phase was influenced by developments around the world, thereby displaying signs of a legal transplant. However, we argue that the formal independence requirements gave rise to considerable doubts as to the functional impact of independent directors.We also discuss the most recent set of reforms to corporate law in India which are moving away from the earlier conception of board independence imported into India and towards greater functionality by adapting the concept to the environment in India. A new legislation, the Companies Act, 2013, provides extensive powers and responsibilities and imposes significant liabilities on independent directors that transform their role to one that emphasizes monitoring. Interestingly, this transformation in India is not the result of international developments, such as the global financial crisis, that called into question the role of independent directors, but the result of internal systemic shocks due to local corporate governance scandals. Although these steps are positive, much is still required before board independence becomes more effective in India. We conclude with some suggested reforms that may further push the board independence concept towards greater effectiveness in India.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度董事会独立:从形式到功能?
在本文中,我们探讨了董事会独立在印度的应用和演变,在印度,上市公司的股权集中是常态,它产生了什么影响,以及如何在印度环境中最好地利用董事会独立的概念。随着印度在20世纪90年代早期的自由化,董事会独立性的第一次尝试是以印度工业联合会推荐的自愿守则的形式出现的,后来被印度证券交易委员会(SEBI)以修订后的形式采用,作为强制性要求。这一正式阶段受到世界各地事态发展的影响,因此显示出法律移植的迹象。然而,我们认为正式的独立性要求对独立董事的功能影响产生了相当大的质疑。我们还讨论了印度公司法的最新改革,这些改革正在从早期引入印度的董事会独立概念转向更大的功能,使这一概念适应印度的环境。2013年的《公司法》(Companies Act)规定了独立董事的广泛权力和责任,并赋予了他们重大责任,将他们的角色转变为强调监督的角色。有趣的是,印度的这种转变并不是国际发展的结果,比如全球金融危机对独立董事的作用提出了质疑,而是当地公司治理丑闻引发的内部系统性冲击的结果。尽管这些措施是积极的,但在印度董事会独立性变得更有效之前,还有很多工作要做。最后,我们提出了一些改革建议,这些建议可能会进一步推动董事会独立概念在印度取得更大的成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why is there so much side-by-side management in the ETF industry? Rights Offers and Delaware Law Interlocking Directorates in Europe – An Enforcement Gap? First-mover Disadvantage: The Sovereign Ratings Mousetrap Avoiding Liability – The Role of Auditors and Comfort Letters in Capital Markets Transaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1