Framework for Managing Multicultural Project Teams

Professor Edward Ochieng, A. Price
{"title":"Framework for Managing Multicultural Project Teams","authors":"Professor Edward Ochieng, A. Price","doi":"10.1108/09699980911002557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present literature that suggests that project teams comprising members from culturally diverse backgrounds bring fresh ideas and new approaches to problem solving. The challenge, however, is that they also introduce different understandings and expectations regarding team dynamics and integration. The question becomes how a project manager can effectively work and influence a multicultural construction project team, at the same time being attentive to the diversity and creating the structure required for success.Design/methodology/approach – Using a qualitative methodology, participants of heavy construction engineering projects revealed a number of multi-dimensional factors that either facilitated or limited the effectiveness of multicultural teamwork. These were synthesised into a framework of eight key dimensions that need to be considered when managing multicultural teams. The identified key dimensions include: leadership style, team selection and composition process, cross-cultural management of team development process, cross-cultural communication, cross-cultural collectivism, cross-cultural trust, cross-cultural management and cross-cultural uncertainty.Findings – The proposed framework has implications for construction managers who work with multicultural teams and are committed to improving team performance and productivity. The utilisation of the proposed framework would not instantly transform multicultural teams into high-performing ones; however, it does identify eight key cross-cultural dimensions, which need to be considered.Originality/value – Though the benefits of culturally diverse teams have been acknowledged within the industry, the study highlighted that cultural differences among project teams can cause conflict, misunderstanding and poor project performance.","PeriodicalId":164119,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"113","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09699980911002557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present literature that suggests that project teams comprising members from culturally diverse backgrounds bring fresh ideas and new approaches to problem solving. The challenge, however, is that they also introduce different understandings and expectations regarding team dynamics and integration. The question becomes how a project manager can effectively work and influence a multicultural construction project team, at the same time being attentive to the diversity and creating the structure required for success.Design/methodology/approach – Using a qualitative methodology, participants of heavy construction engineering projects revealed a number of multi-dimensional factors that either facilitated or limited the effectiveness of multicultural teamwork. These were synthesised into a framework of eight key dimensions that need to be considered when managing multicultural teams. The identified key dimensions include: leadership style, team selection and composition process, cross-cultural management of team development process, cross-cultural communication, cross-cultural collectivism, cross-cultural trust, cross-cultural management and cross-cultural uncertainty.Findings – The proposed framework has implications for construction managers who work with multicultural teams and are committed to improving team performance and productivity. The utilisation of the proposed framework would not instantly transform multicultural teams into high-performing ones; however, it does identify eight key cross-cultural dimensions, which need to be considered.Originality/value – Though the benefits of culturally diverse teams have been acknowledged within the industry, the study highlighted that cultural differences among project teams can cause conflict, misunderstanding and poor project performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理多元文化项目团队的框架
目的-本文的目的是提供文献,表明由不同文化背景的成员组成的项目团队为解决问题带来了新的想法和新的方法。然而,挑战在于它们也引入了关于团队动态和整合的不同理解和期望。问题变成了项目经理如何有效地工作和影响一个多元文化的建筑项目团队,同时关注多样性并创造成功所需的结构。设计/方法/方法-使用定性方法,重型建筑工程项目的参与者揭示了许多多维因素,这些因素促进或限制了多元文化团队合作的有效性。这些被综合成一个由八个关键维度组成的框架,在管理多元文化团队时需要考虑这些维度。确定的关键维度包括:领导风格、团队选择和组成过程、团队发展过程的跨文化管理、跨文化沟通、跨文化集体主义、跨文化信任、跨文化管理和跨文化不确定性。研究结果-建议的框架对与多元文化团队合作并致力于提高团队绩效和生产力的施工经理具有启示意义。采用所提出的框架不会立即将多元文化团队转变为高绩效团队;然而,它确实确定了需要考虑的八个关键的跨文化维度。原创性/价值——尽管行业内已经认识到文化多样性团队的好处,但研究强调,项目团队之间的文化差异可能会导致冲突、误解和糟糕的项目绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Team Conflict: The 'Chatty' Accusation at the Customer Support Call Center Accountability One Step Removed Friends Asking Friends for Charity: The Importance of Gifts and Audience The Relationship between Team Identification and Organisational Identification: The Case of the Australian Rugby Union Team Incentives and Reference-Dependent Preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1