Automatic summarization of API reviews

Gias Uddin, Foutse Khomh
{"title":"Automatic summarization of API reviews","authors":"Gias Uddin, Foutse Khomh","doi":"10.1109/ASE.2017.8115629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the proliferation of online developer forums as informal documentation, developers often share their opinions about the APIs they use. However, given the plethora of opinions available for an API in various online developer forums, it can be challenging for a developer to make informed decisions about the APIs. While automatic summarization of opinions have been explored for other domains (e.g., cameras, cars), we found little research that investigates the benefits of summaries of public API reviews. In this paper, we present two algorithms (statistical and aspect-based) to summarize opinions about APIs. To investigate the usefulness of the techniques, we developed, Opiner, an online opinion summarization engine that presents summaries of opinions using both our proposed techniques and existing six off-the-shelf techniques. We investigated the usefulness of Opiner using two case studies, both involving professional software engineers. We found that developers were interested to use our proposed summaries much more frequently than other summaries (daily vs once a year) and that while combined with Stack Overflow, Opiner helped developers to make the right decision with more accuracy and confidence and in less time.","PeriodicalId":382876,"journal":{"name":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"64","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 32nd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASE.2017.8115629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 64

Abstract

With the proliferation of online developer forums as informal documentation, developers often share their opinions about the APIs they use. However, given the plethora of opinions available for an API in various online developer forums, it can be challenging for a developer to make informed decisions about the APIs. While automatic summarization of opinions have been explored for other domains (e.g., cameras, cars), we found little research that investigates the benefits of summaries of public API reviews. In this paper, we present two algorithms (statistical and aspect-based) to summarize opinions about APIs. To investigate the usefulness of the techniques, we developed, Opiner, an online opinion summarization engine that presents summaries of opinions using both our proposed techniques and existing six off-the-shelf techniques. We investigated the usefulness of Opiner using two case studies, both involving professional software engineers. We found that developers were interested to use our proposed summaries much more frequently than other summaries (daily vs once a year) and that while combined with Stack Overflow, Opiner helped developers to make the right decision with more accuracy and confidence and in less time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
API评审的自动汇总
随着作为非正式文档的在线开发人员论坛的激增,开发人员经常分享他们对所使用的api的看法。然而,考虑到各种在线开发人员论坛上关于API的大量意见,开发人员对API做出明智的决定可能是一项挑战。虽然在其他领域(例如,相机,汽车)已经探索了意见的自动摘要,但我们发现很少有研究调查公共API评论摘要的好处。在本文中,我们提出了两种算法(统计和基于方面)来总结关于api的观点。为了调查这些技术的有用性,我们开发了在线意见摘要引擎Opiner,该引擎使用我们提出的技术和现有的六种现成技术来呈现意见摘要。我们使用两个案例研究来调查Opiner的有用性,这两个案例都涉及到专业的软件工程师。我们发现,比起其他总结,开发者更愿意频繁地使用我们的建议总结(每天一次,而不是一年一次),并且与Stack Overflow相结合,Opiner帮助开发者在更短的时间内更准确、更自信地做出正确的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TiQi: A natural language interface for querying software project data A comprehensive study on real world concurrency bugs in Node.js Managing software evolution through semantic history slicing Software performance self-adaptation through efficient model predictive control Privacy-aware data-intensive applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1