Evidence to Achieve an Optimal Model for Children’s Health in Europe

M. Blair, M. Rigby, D. Alexander
{"title":"Evidence to Achieve an Optimal Model for Children’s Health in Europe","authors":"M. Blair, M. Rigby, D. Alexander","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78973-351-820191004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nModels of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) was a wide-ranging, multi-disciplinary and multi-method study that aimed to identify the best models of provision of primary care for the children of the European Union. The research has identified two main conclusions: (1) The depth of interdependency of health, economy and society. Primary care needs to be an active partner in public debate about current child health concerns. It should orientate more effectively in addressing wider societal influences on child health through advocacy and collaborative intersectoral public health approaches with those agencies responsible for public and community health if it is to address effectively issues such as childhood obesity, mental health and vaccine hesitancy. As part of this, it needs to address its workforce composition and skills, not least in two-way communication. (2) The European Community has many visions and commitments to children and child health policies, but their effectiveness is largely unfulfilled. The Commission can strengthen its impact on children’s health and healthcare services within current remits and resources by focusing on a number of key fields: planned and structured research, providing insight into optimal human resources and skills in child primary care, developing and using ethical means of listening to children’s views, remedying the invisibility of children in data, measuring the quality of primary care from a child-centric perspective, understanding the economics of investing in children’s health, developing e-health standards and evaluation, collaborative and harmonised use of downloaded research databases, understanding and respecting children’s rights and equity, and appreciating and allowing for children’s evolving autonomy as they grow up. An optimal model of primary care for children is proactive, inclusive, corporately linked, based on and providing robust evidence, and respects the wider determinants of health and children’s involvement in their health trajectory.","PeriodicalId":373125,"journal":{"name":"Issues and Opportunities in Primary Health Care for Children in Europe","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues and Opportunities in Primary Health Care for Children in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-351-820191004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Models of Child Health Appraised (MOCHA) was a wide-ranging, multi-disciplinary and multi-method study that aimed to identify the best models of provision of primary care for the children of the European Union. The research has identified two main conclusions: (1) The depth of interdependency of health, economy and society. Primary care needs to be an active partner in public debate about current child health concerns. It should orientate more effectively in addressing wider societal influences on child health through advocacy and collaborative intersectoral public health approaches with those agencies responsible for public and community health if it is to address effectively issues such as childhood obesity, mental health and vaccine hesitancy. As part of this, it needs to address its workforce composition and skills, not least in two-way communication. (2) The European Community has many visions and commitments to children and child health policies, but their effectiveness is largely unfulfilled. The Commission can strengthen its impact on children’s health and healthcare services within current remits and resources by focusing on a number of key fields: planned and structured research, providing insight into optimal human resources and skills in child primary care, developing and using ethical means of listening to children’s views, remedying the invisibility of children in data, measuring the quality of primary care from a child-centric perspective, understanding the economics of investing in children’s health, developing e-health standards and evaluation, collaborative and harmonised use of downloaded research databases, understanding and respecting children’s rights and equity, and appreciating and allowing for children’s evolving autonomy as they grow up. An optimal model of primary care for children is proactive, inclusive, corporately linked, based on and providing robust evidence, and respects the wider determinants of health and children’s involvement in their health trajectory.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现欧洲儿童健康最佳模式的证据
儿童健康评估模型(MOCHA)是一项广泛、多学科和多方法的研究,旨在确定为欧盟儿童提供初级保健的最佳模式。研究得出了两个主要结论:(1)卫生、经济和社会相互依存的深度。初级保健需要成为有关当前儿童健康问题的公开辩论的积极伙伴。如果要有效解决儿童肥胖、心理健康和疫苗犹豫等问题,就应更有效地侧重于通过倡导和与负责公共和社区卫生的机构合作的部门间公共卫生办法,处理对儿童健康的更广泛的社会影响。作为其中的一部分,它需要解决其劳动力构成和技能问题,尤其是在双向沟通方面。(2)欧洲共同体对儿童和儿童保健政策有许多愿景和承诺,但其效力在很大程度上尚未实现。委员会可以在目前的职权范围和资源范围内加强其对儿童健康和保健服务的影响,办法是侧重于以下几个关键领域:有计划和有组织的研究,为儿童初级保健方面的最佳人力资源和技能提供见解,制定和使用听取儿童意见的道德手段,纠正数据中对儿童的忽视,从以儿童为中心的角度衡量初级保健的质量,了解投资于儿童健康的经济学,制定电子保健标准和评价,协作和协调地使用下载的研究数据库,理解和尊重儿童的权利和公平,欣赏和允许儿童在成长过程中不断发展的自主权。儿童初级保健的最佳模式是积极主动、包容、整体联系、以有力证据为基础并提供有力证据,尊重健康的更广泛决定因素和儿童参与其健康轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
e-Health as the Enabler of Primary Care for Children National and Public Cultures as Determinants of Health Policy and Production Equity The Conundrum of Measuring Children’s Primary Health Care Listening to Young People
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1