“I’M A PEOPLE TOO”: ALEXEI KONSTANTINOVICH TOLSTOY AND THE SLAVOPHILES

A. Fedorov
{"title":"“I’M A PEOPLE TOO”: ALEXEI KONSTANTINOVICH TOLSTOY AND THE SLAVOPHILES","authors":"A. Fedorov","doi":"10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the complex relationship of A.K. Tolstoy to the Slavophiles and their teachings. These relationships have been reflected in creativity and have undergone significant changes over time. Relative proximity - mid-1850 s, dialogue - late 1850 s-early 1860 s, polemic -late 1860 s-1870 s. The period of unity was associated with his interest as an artist in folk song stylistics and the idea of Slavic reunification. Then the desire to explain his aesthetic position matures in him, which is at odds with the ideas of the Slavophiles about the meaning and purpose of art (a poetic message to “I.S. Aksakov”). Subsequently, the dialogue develops into a polemic with a wider range of issues - Tolstoy does not accept a utilitarian attitude to literature, defends his understanding of the people, rethinks the role of Peter the Great in Russian history, exposes the painful consequences of the “Moscow” period, stigmatizes “Tatarism” as a dream of a new khan and an apology for tyranny and slavery, does not want to recognize superiority over the West in moral and religious terms, finally, paradoxically brings nihilists and Slavophiles closer, showing the destructive consequences of their ideas (“Potok-bogatyr”).","PeriodicalId":246030,"journal":{"name":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literaturovedcheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31249/litzhur/2022.55.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the complex relationship of A.K. Tolstoy to the Slavophiles and their teachings. These relationships have been reflected in creativity and have undergone significant changes over time. Relative proximity - mid-1850 s, dialogue - late 1850 s-early 1860 s, polemic -late 1860 s-1870 s. The period of unity was associated with his interest as an artist in folk song stylistics and the idea of Slavic reunification. Then the desire to explain his aesthetic position matures in him, which is at odds with the ideas of the Slavophiles about the meaning and purpose of art (a poetic message to “I.S. Aksakov”). Subsequently, the dialogue develops into a polemic with a wider range of issues - Tolstoy does not accept a utilitarian attitude to literature, defends his understanding of the people, rethinks the role of Peter the Great in Russian history, exposes the painful consequences of the “Moscow” period, stigmatizes “Tatarism” as a dream of a new khan and an apology for tyranny and slavery, does not want to recognize superiority over the West in moral and religious terms, finally, paradoxically brings nihilists and Slavophiles closer, showing the destructive consequences of their ideas (“Potok-bogatyr”).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我也是一个民族”:阿列克谢·康斯坦丁诺维奇·托尔斯泰与斯拉夫主义者
本文考察了托尔斯泰与斯拉夫派及其教义的复杂关系。这些关系反映在创造力中,并随着时间的推移发生了重大变化。相对接近-1850年代中期,对话-1850年代晚期- 1860年代早期,争论- 1860年代晚期-1870年代。统一时期与他作为一名艺术家对民歌文体学的兴趣和斯拉夫统一的想法有关。然后,解释他的审美立场的愿望在他身上成熟起来,这与斯拉夫主义者关于艺术的意义和目的的想法不一致(对《美国人》的诗意信息)Aksakov”)。随后,对话发展成一场争论,涉及更广泛的问题——托尔斯泰不接受对文学的功利主义态度,捍卫他对人民的理解,重新思考彼得大帝在俄罗斯历史上的作用,揭露“莫斯科”时期的痛苦后果,将“鞑靼主义”污名化为新可汗的梦想和对暴政和奴隶制的道歉,不想承认在道德和宗教方面比西方优越,最后,矛盾的是,它拉近了虚无主义者和斯拉夫主义者的距离,展示了他们的思想的破坏性后果(“Potok-bogatyr”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MARINA TSVETAEVA IN THE BIOGRAPHY OF PRINCE D.P. SVYATOPOLK-MIRSKY “DETERMINE THE MEANING OF WORDS.”: ON THE SOURCES OF PUSHKIN’S MAXIM M.P. Pogodin about I.A. Krylov I.A. Krylov and his biographical myth ON THE ISSUE OF THE COMPLETE COLLECTION OF HISTORICAL AND PHILOLOGICAL WORKS OF M.P. POGODIN
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1