Assessment of the Effect of Plant Spacing on Runoff, Soil Erosion and Soybean Yield (Glycine Max L)

A. T.A, Jijingi H.E, Anyadike C.C
{"title":"Assessment of the Effect of Plant Spacing on Runoff, Soil Erosion and Soybean Yield (Glycine Max L)","authors":"A. T.A, Jijingi H.E, Anyadike C.C","doi":"10.38124/ijisrt20jun773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of the effect of different plant spacing on runoff, soil erosion and soybean yield was conducted in Yandev, Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. The site for the experiment was manually cleared of its natural vegetation. The experiment was performed on nine 2m x 1m micro plots of fine tilt and slope 3%. Boundaries of burnt bricks were built round each micro-plot to prevent the entry of runoff from adjacent plots and land. Collecting pits were excavated at the lower end of each micro-plot in the direction of the slope and plastic bucket collectors of 40 litres were installed to catch runoff and soil erosion sediments from the micro plots. The size of each micro plot was 2m2 . The experiment consisted of three treatments replicated three times. Treatment one (T1) with plant spacing of 20cm x 20cm, treatment two (T2) with plant spacing of 30cm x 30cm and treatment three (T3) with plant spacing of 40cm x 40cm. Runoff and soil erosion data were determined after each rain storm by measuring the runoff with a 1000ml measuring cylinder. The soil erosion was determined by measuring the oven dried soil erosion sediment with an electronic weighing balance. The soybean yield was determined by weighing the harvested and sun dried soybean grain at a moisture content of 12.6% using an electronic weighing balance. The values of the runoff from the different treatments are 202.50 m3 /ha for treatment one (T1) with plant spacing 20cm x 2cm, 221.00 m3 /ha for treatment two (T2) with plant spacing 30cmx30cm and 238.50 m3 /ha for treatment three (T3) with plant spacing 40cmx40cm. The mean soil erosion values were 16.87 kg/ha for treatment one (T1), 48.03 kg/ha for treatment two (T2) and 142.20 kg/ha for treatment three (T3).","PeriodicalId":355617,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt20jun773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study of the effect of different plant spacing on runoff, soil erosion and soybean yield was conducted in Yandev, Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. The site for the experiment was manually cleared of its natural vegetation. The experiment was performed on nine 2m x 1m micro plots of fine tilt and slope 3%. Boundaries of burnt bricks were built round each micro-plot to prevent the entry of runoff from adjacent plots and land. Collecting pits were excavated at the lower end of each micro-plot in the direction of the slope and plastic bucket collectors of 40 litres were installed to catch runoff and soil erosion sediments from the micro plots. The size of each micro plot was 2m2 . The experiment consisted of three treatments replicated three times. Treatment one (T1) with plant spacing of 20cm x 20cm, treatment two (T2) with plant spacing of 30cm x 30cm and treatment three (T3) with plant spacing of 40cm x 40cm. Runoff and soil erosion data were determined after each rain storm by measuring the runoff with a 1000ml measuring cylinder. The soil erosion was determined by measuring the oven dried soil erosion sediment with an electronic weighing balance. The soybean yield was determined by weighing the harvested and sun dried soybean grain at a moisture content of 12.6% using an electronic weighing balance. The values of the runoff from the different treatments are 202.50 m3 /ha for treatment one (T1) with plant spacing 20cm x 2cm, 221.00 m3 /ha for treatment two (T2) with plant spacing 30cmx30cm and 238.50 m3 /ha for treatment three (T3) with plant spacing 40cmx40cm. The mean soil erosion values were 16.87 kg/ha for treatment one (T1), 48.03 kg/ha for treatment two (T2) and 142.20 kg/ha for treatment three (T3).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植间距对径流、土壤侵蚀及大豆产量影响的评价
在尼日利亚贝努埃州的Yandev, Gboko进行了不同种植间距对径流、土壤侵蚀和大豆产量的影响研究。实验场地的自然植被被人工清除。试验在9个2m × 1m的微细倾斜、坡度3%的地块上进行。在每个微地块周围建立了烧砖边界,以防止相邻地块和土地的径流进入。在斜坡方向的每个微地块的下端挖掘收集坑,并安装40升塑料桶收集器,以收集微地块的径流和土壤侵蚀沉积物。每个微型地块的面积为2平方米。实验包括三个处理,重复三次。处理1 (T1)株距20cm × 20cm,处理2 (T2)株距30cm × 30cm,处理3 (T3)株距40cm × 40cm。每次暴雨后,用1000ml测量筒测量径流,确定径流和土壤侵蚀数据。用电子称量秤测量烘干后的土壤侵蚀底泥,测定土壤侵蚀量。大豆产量是用电子称量秤在水分含量为12.6%时对收获和晒干的大豆籽粒进行称重来确定的。不同处理的径流量值分别为:1号处理(T1) 202.50 m3 /ha,株距20cm × 2cm; 2号处理(T2) 221.00 m3 /ha,株距30cmx30cm; 3号处理(T3) 238.50 m3 /ha,株距40cmx40cm。处理1 (T1)、处理2 (T2)和处理3 (T3)的平均土壤侵蚀值分别为16.87 kg/ha、48.03 kg/ha和142.20 kg/ha。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 10 - October Blood Pressure and Control Factor in Hypertensives Monitored at the Referral Hopsital in Boma. Democratic Repubic of the Congo The Role of Social Responsibility Accounting Impact in Supporting Competitive Advantage for Industrial Establishment (Filed Study on the Company Matthew Petroleum) Role of the External Auditor in Reducing Tax Evasion (Field Study- Tax Chamber of Sudan) Volume 5 - 2020, Issue 9 - September
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1