Research on the threshold of symbiosis between finance and real economy – empirical test based on banking panel threshold model

Conglai Fan, Xinlei Cai, Jian Lin
{"title":"Research on the threshold of symbiosis between finance and real economy – empirical test based on banking panel threshold model","authors":"Conglai Fan, Xinlei Cai, Jian Lin","doi":"10.1108/cpe-11-2021-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeStarting from the theoretical mechanism of profit sharing between finance and the real economy, this paper reviews and analyzes the profitability of China's banking industry and makes a horizontal comparison with the banking industry of the United States, Japan, and Germany.Design/methodology/approachBased on the panel threshold model, it is found that there is a dual-threshold asymmetric effect between banking profit and the growth of real economy. When the net profit rate of the banking industry is lower than 0.491%, the increase in banking profitability will inhibit the growth of real economy due to profit grabbing; when the rate falls within the range of 0.491–0.801%, the increase in bank profitability is conducive to the growth of real economy.FindingsFinance and the real economy are in the most comfortable symbiotic state; when the rate is higher than 0.801%, the continued increase in bank profitability will weaken the promotion effect of finance on the real economy, but bank profitability and the growth of real economy are still in a symbiotic state of positive promotion.Originality/valueThe promotion effect of China's bank profitability to the growth of real economy has shifted from the suboptimal state to the optimal range as a whole, which is attributed to the strong deleveraging and strict supervision of the Chinese government after 2016, the timely and decisive “stepping on the brakes”, pulling the financial sector back from the “illusion” caused by “self-circulated” profits and preventing it from harming the real economy.","PeriodicalId":250696,"journal":{"name":"China Political Economy","volume":"58 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cpe-11-2021-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeStarting from the theoretical mechanism of profit sharing between finance and the real economy, this paper reviews and analyzes the profitability of China's banking industry and makes a horizontal comparison with the banking industry of the United States, Japan, and Germany.Design/methodology/approachBased on the panel threshold model, it is found that there is a dual-threshold asymmetric effect between banking profit and the growth of real economy. When the net profit rate of the banking industry is lower than 0.491%, the increase in banking profitability will inhibit the growth of real economy due to profit grabbing; when the rate falls within the range of 0.491–0.801%, the increase in bank profitability is conducive to the growth of real economy.FindingsFinance and the real economy are in the most comfortable symbiotic state; when the rate is higher than 0.801%, the continued increase in bank profitability will weaken the promotion effect of finance on the real economy, but bank profitability and the growth of real economy are still in a symbiotic state of positive promotion.Originality/valueThe promotion effect of China's bank profitability to the growth of real economy has shifted from the suboptimal state to the optimal range as a whole, which is attributed to the strong deleveraging and strict supervision of the Chinese government after 2016, the timely and decisive “stepping on the brakes”, pulling the financial sector back from the “illusion” caused by “self-circulated” profits and preventing it from harming the real economy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
金融与实体经济共生阈值研究——基于银行业面板阈值模型的实证检验
目的本文从金融与实体经济利润分享的理论机制出发,对中国银行业的盈利能力进行回顾分析,并与美国、日本、德国银行业进行横向比较。基于面板阈值模型,发现银行利润与实体经济增长之间存在双阈值不对称效应。当银行业净利润率低于0.491%时,银行盈利能力的提高会因利润攫取而抑制实体经济的增长;当利率在0.491-0.801%范围内时,银行盈利能力的提高有利于实体经济的增长。金融与实体经济处于最舒适的共生状态;当该比率高于0.801%时,银行盈利能力的持续提高将削弱金融对实体经济的促进作用,但银行盈利能力与实体经济增长仍处于正向促进的共生状态。中国银行盈利能力对实体经济增长的促进作用从整体上从次优状态转向最优区间,这得益于2016年以后中国政府的强力去杠杆和严格监管,及时果断的“踩刹车”,将金融业从“自循环”利润造成的“幻觉”中拉了回来,防止了其对实体经济的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expanding and developing the theoretical implications of socialist market economy with China's experience The political economy explanation of the logic of China’s “two miracles” Constructing the foundations of microeconomic analysis of Chinese economics: based on the theory of classified reform of state-owned enterprise The logic behind evolution of economic systems under uncertainty and the choice of a socialist market economy Construction of the new development dynamic and development of digital economy: internal logic and policy focus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1