A Unified Approach for Airfoil Parameterization Using Bezier Curves

Dheeraj Agarwal, P. Sahu
{"title":"A Unified Approach for Airfoil Parameterization Using Bezier Curves","authors":"Dheeraj Agarwal, P. Sahu","doi":"10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.241-245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Parametrization is at the core of optimization, as it defines the design space that the optimizing algorithm explores. The success of any shape optimization methodology depends extensively on the type of parameterization technique employed [10]. One straightforward route which results in the most flexible parametrization strategy is to use the nodes of the computational mesh as the design variables. One major drawback for this parameterization strategy is that, as all surface mesh nodes can move independently, the implementation of a smoothing algorithm is required to prevent the appearance of non-smooth shapes during the optimization process. In this regard, the Free-form deformation (FFD) techniques have been successfully implemented for aerodynamic shape optimization problems [Ref]. The benefit of this approach is that it imparts smooth deformations to the analysis mesh and enables the parameterization to alter the thickness, sweep, twist, etc. for the design of an aerospace system. However, in either of these parameterization strategies it is only the mesh which reaches the optimum, and must be translated into a CAD model before it can be used for further analysis or manufacturing assessments. Thus, to align with the industrial ambition of having a more integrated design workflow, the compatibility of design parameterization with Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software has become very important. In the recent past, some authors have attempted to develop optimization processes based on parameterization developed with CAD systems. These include, parameterization based on nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) [8], B-Splines in the Open-Cascade Technology [6], parameters defining CAD features [3] and Bezier curves [4] within CATIA V5. But there has been no standard approach which can be followed to parameterize different airfoil geometries and can also be used within CAD systems. In this research, a unified approach is presented to obtain the Bezier parameterizations for different airfoil geometries obtained from the UIUC Airfoil Data Site [2].","PeriodicalId":166025,"journal":{"name":"CAD'21 Proceedings","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CAD'21 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14733/CADCONFP.2021.241-245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Parametrization is at the core of optimization, as it defines the design space that the optimizing algorithm explores. The success of any shape optimization methodology depends extensively on the type of parameterization technique employed [10]. One straightforward route which results in the most flexible parametrization strategy is to use the nodes of the computational mesh as the design variables. One major drawback for this parameterization strategy is that, as all surface mesh nodes can move independently, the implementation of a smoothing algorithm is required to prevent the appearance of non-smooth shapes during the optimization process. In this regard, the Free-form deformation (FFD) techniques have been successfully implemented for aerodynamic shape optimization problems [Ref]. The benefit of this approach is that it imparts smooth deformations to the analysis mesh and enables the parameterization to alter the thickness, sweep, twist, etc. for the design of an aerospace system. However, in either of these parameterization strategies it is only the mesh which reaches the optimum, and must be translated into a CAD model before it can be used for further analysis or manufacturing assessments. Thus, to align with the industrial ambition of having a more integrated design workflow, the compatibility of design parameterization with Computer-Aided Design (CAD) software has become very important. In the recent past, some authors have attempted to develop optimization processes based on parameterization developed with CAD systems. These include, parameterization based on nonuniform rational B-splines (NURBS) [8], B-Splines in the Open-Cascade Technology [6], parameters defining CAD features [3] and Bezier curves [4] within CATIA V5. But there has been no standard approach which can be followed to parameterize different airfoil geometries and can also be used within CAD systems. In this research, a unified approach is presented to obtain the Bezier parameterizations for different airfoil geometries obtained from the UIUC Airfoil Data Site [2].
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Bezier曲线进行翼型参数化的统一方法
参数化是优化的核心,因为它定义了优化算法所探索的设计空间。任何形状优化方法的成功在很大程度上取决于所采用的参数化技术的类型[10]。使用计算网格的节点作为设计变量是最灵活的参数化策略的一种直接途径。这种参数化策略的一个主要缺点是,由于所有表面网格节点都可以独立移动,因此需要实现平滑算法以防止在优化过程中出现非光滑形状。在这方面,自由形式变形(FFD)技术已经成功地应用于气动形状优化问题[参考文献]。这种方法的好处是它赋予分析网格平滑变形,并使参数化能够改变航空航天系统设计的厚度、扫描、扭曲等。然而,在这两种参数化策略中,只有网格达到最佳,并且必须在用于进一步分析或制造评估之前转换为CAD模型。因此,为了与拥有更集成的设计工作流的工业目标保持一致,设计参数化与计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件的兼容性变得非常重要。在最近的过去,一些作者试图开发基于参数化与CAD系统开发的优化过程。这些包括,基于非均匀有理b样条(NURBS)的参数化[8],开级联技术中的b样条[6],CATIA V5中的参数定义CAD特征[3]和Bezier曲线[4]。但一直没有标准的方法,可以遵循参数化不同的翼型几何形状,也可以在CAD系统内使用。在这项研究中,提出了一种统一的方法来获得来自UIUC翼型数据站点[2]的不同翼型几何形状的Bezier参数化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interior Ball-Pivoting on Point Clouds for Offsetting Triangular Meshes Modeling Coverage Areas of Anisotropic Transmitters by Voronoi-like Structures Hybrid Line-Arc Toolpath Machining with Corner Transition and Grouping Lookahead Scheme A Semi-Automatic CAD Procedure to Design Custom-made Surgical Cutting Guides Comparative Study of 3D Reconstruction Methods for Medical Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1