Biomechanical Study of Simulated Metastatic Peri-Acetabular Defects

F. Patterson, J. Thomson, J. Benevenia, Kathleen S Beebe, Michael N. Kang
{"title":"Biomechanical Study of Simulated Metastatic Peri-Acetabular Defects","authors":"F. Patterson, J. Thomson, J. Benevenia, Kathleen S Beebe, Michael N. Kang","doi":"10.31487/J.JSO.2018.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peri-acetabular metastasis presents the risk of fracture. However, the relationship between bone loss and \nfracture risk is unknown. Utilizing fresh frozen intact cadaver pelves, Harrington class I lesions were \nsimulated. Lesions were categorized as small ( 40%) Axial loading was applied in a quasistatic mechanism by a mechanical testing system to catastrophic failure, with the load-to-failure force being \nmeasured. There was statistical difference in the load-to-failure force between hemi-pelves with large \ndefects and their matched controls. It was found that mean load-to-failure strength of a hemi-pelvis with a \nClass I defect was more than 2.3-2.45 times the calculated hip joint reactive force. Thus, it was concluded \nthat a pelvis with a peri-acetabular defect of greater than 40% has a significantly lower load-to-failure \nstrength compared to an intact pelvis. However, even this large Class I defect will fracture only at supraphysiologic loads and the hip joint may not normally be exposed to forces that high.","PeriodicalId":320469,"journal":{"name":"Endoprosthetic Total Scapula Replacement Versus Suspension Arthroplasty Following Tumor Resection","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endoprosthetic Total Scapula Replacement Versus Suspension Arthroplasty Following Tumor Resection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/J.JSO.2018.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peri-acetabular metastasis presents the risk of fracture. However, the relationship between bone loss and fracture risk is unknown. Utilizing fresh frozen intact cadaver pelves, Harrington class I lesions were simulated. Lesions were categorized as small ( 40%) Axial loading was applied in a quasistatic mechanism by a mechanical testing system to catastrophic failure, with the load-to-failure force being measured. There was statistical difference in the load-to-failure force between hemi-pelves with large defects and their matched controls. It was found that mean load-to-failure strength of a hemi-pelvis with a Class I defect was more than 2.3-2.45 times the calculated hip joint reactive force. Thus, it was concluded that a pelvis with a peri-acetabular defect of greater than 40% has a significantly lower load-to-failure strength compared to an intact pelvis. However, even this large Class I defect will fracture only at supraphysiologic loads and the hip joint may not normally be exposed to forces that high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模拟转移性髋臼周围缺损的生物力学研究
髋臼周围转移有骨折的危险。然而,骨质流失与骨折风险之间的关系尚不清楚。利用新鲜冷冻完整的尸体骨盆,模拟哈林顿I级病变。在准静态机构中,通过机械测试系统施加轴向载荷以达到灾难性破坏,并测量载荷-破坏力。有统计学差异的载荷到破坏力之间的半盆大缺陷和他们匹配的控制。结果发现,具有I类缺陷的半骨盆的平均载荷-失效强度大于计算髋关节反作用力的2.3-2.45倍。因此,我们得出结论,与完整骨盆相比,髋臼周围缺损大于40%的骨盆具有明显较低的载荷-失效强度。然而,即使是这种大的I级缺陷也只会在超生理负荷下发生骨折,而髋关节通常不会暴露在那么高的力下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of the complete pathological response in rectal cancer: Value as a prognostic factor Biomechanical Study of Simulated Metastatic Peri-Acetabular Defects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1