Feminist Aims and a Trans-Inclusive Definition of “Woman”

Katie Kirkland
{"title":"Feminist Aims and a Trans-Inclusive Definition of “Woman”","authors":"Katie Kirkland","doi":"10.5206/FPQ/2019.1.7313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” Katharine Jenkins argues that Sally Haslanger’s focal analysis of gender problematically excludes nonpassing trans women from the category “woman.” However, Jenkins does not explain why this exclusion contradicts the feminist aims of Haslanger’s account. In this paper, I advance two arguments that suggest that a trans-inclusive account of “woman” is crucial to the aims of feminism. I claim that the aims of feminism are to understand and combat women’s oppression. First, I argue that denial of trans identities reinforces cultural ideas that perpetuate both transphobic violence and sexual violence against women. Consequently, a feminist account of “woman” that fails to respect trans identities indirectly contributes to the oppression of women. Second, I prove that nonpassing trans women are oppressed as women through the internalization of sexual objectification. I then conclude that an account of “woman” that excludes nonpassing trans women cannot successfully advance a complete understanding of women’s oppression.","PeriodicalId":387473,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Philosophy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5206/FPQ/2019.1.7313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In “Amelioration and Inclusion: Gender Identity and the Concept of Woman,” Katharine Jenkins argues that Sally Haslanger’s focal analysis of gender problematically excludes nonpassing trans women from the category “woman.” However, Jenkins does not explain why this exclusion contradicts the feminist aims of Haslanger’s account. In this paper, I advance two arguments that suggest that a trans-inclusive account of “woman” is crucial to the aims of feminism. I claim that the aims of feminism are to understand and combat women’s oppression. First, I argue that denial of trans identities reinforces cultural ideas that perpetuate both transphobic violence and sexual violence against women. Consequently, a feminist account of “woman” that fails to respect trans identities indirectly contributes to the oppression of women. Second, I prove that nonpassing trans women are oppressed as women through the internalization of sexual objectification. I then conclude that an account of “woman” that excludes nonpassing trans women cannot successfully advance a complete understanding of women’s oppression.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女权主义目标与跨包容性的“女性”定义
在《改善与包容:性别认同与女性概念》一书中,凯瑟琳·詹金斯(Katharine Jenkins)认为,萨利·哈斯兰格(Sally Haslanger)对性别的重点分析有问题地将不合格的变性女性排除在“女性”的范畴之外。然而,詹金斯并没有解释为什么这种排斥与哈斯兰格描述的女权主义目标相矛盾。在本文中,我提出了两个论点,表明对“女性”的跨性别包容性描述对女权主义的目标至关重要。我认为女权主义的目标是理解和反对女性所受的压迫。首先,我认为,否认跨性别身份强化了文化观念,使对跨性别者的暴力和对女性的性暴力永久化。因此,不尊重跨性别身份的女权主义对“女性”的描述间接地导致了对女性的压迫。其次,通过性物化的内化,我证明了不合格的跨性别女性作为女性受到了压迫。然后,我得出结论,对“女人”的描述不包括不合格的变性女性,不能成功地促进对女性压迫的全面理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mary Daly’s Philosophy: Some Bergsonian Themes Hope, Solidarity, and Justice If “Ifs” and “Buts” Were Candy and Nuts Mansplaining as Epistemic Injustice How Not to Watch Feminist Pornography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1